2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic reaction in a circulating fluidized bed riser: Ozone decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the conversion of ozone increases with the solids holdup, as confirmed by other researchers . There appears to be a linear relationship between the total ozone conversion and the mean solids holdup as shown in Figure .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the conversion of ozone increases with the solids holdup, as confirmed by other researchers . There appears to be a linear relationship between the total ozone conversion and the mean solids holdup as shown in Figure .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Considering the numerous studies on hydrodynamics and hot model reactions in CFB riser reactors, not much efforts devoted to hydrodynamics and especially to reactor performance in downers in recent years . Previous studies using catalytic ozone decomposition as a model reaction to evaluate reactor performance were mainly focused on gas ‐ solids contacting in CFB risers . To the best of our knowledge, only two research groups carried out some introductory studies on the reactor performance in downers using this model reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 displays the relationship between overall conversion and the solids holdup in the riser and downer reactors. Generally, the conversion of ozone increases with the solids holdup, as confirmed by other researchers [9,29,30]. There appears to be a linear relationship between the total ozone conversion and the mean solids holdup in both riser and downer reactors.…”
Section: Relationship Between Solids Holdup Damköhler Number and Ovesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Otherwise, by assuming a homogeneous system, e.g., ideal plug flow, overestimation of the conversion rate in heterogeneous systems is likely to result. The contact efficiency could be determined by assuming a riser as a steady-state plug flow reactor: 24 , 25 , 48 , 50 , 63 with a solution: where s is the averaged solids volume fraction in a slice of thickness Δz , U the gas superficial velocity, K ov the apparent volumetric reaction rate constant, γ pf a gas–solid contact efficiency, and Da the Damköhler number defined as The gas–solid contact efficiency γ pf could be computed at different axial increments of Δz , by quantifying the contact efficiency as the ratio between the apparent conversion rate and the conversion obtained when a 1D plug flow model is assumed, ignoring any heterogeneity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%