2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2020.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic performance of Ni catalysts supported on CeO2 with different morphologies for low-temperature CO2 methanation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With 10 wt% nickel content, Ni/CeO 2 catalysts supported on CeO 2 nanoparticle, CeO 2 nanorod, CeO 2 nanocube, were marked as Ni/CeO 2 ‐P, Ni/CeO 2 ‐R, and Ni/CeO 2 ‐C, respectively. Furthermore, for comparison with the supported catalysts with industrial‐scale synthesis, the CeO 2 ‐P was chosen as the support of Ni/CeO 2 catalyst prepared by impregnation method as follows: 0.165 g of Ni(NO 3 ) 2 ·6H 2 O was dissolved into 20 mL of deionized water and then mixed with 0.300 g of bulk CeO 2 support and stirred for 6 hr; using rotary evaporator to gradually remove water, the sample powder was left to completely dry overnight followed by calcination at 600 °C for 4 hr, 28 which marked as Ni/CeO 2 ‐I.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With 10 wt% nickel content, Ni/CeO 2 catalysts supported on CeO 2 nanoparticle, CeO 2 nanorod, CeO 2 nanocube, were marked as Ni/CeO 2 ‐P, Ni/CeO 2 ‐R, and Ni/CeO 2 ‐C, respectively. Furthermore, for comparison with the supported catalysts with industrial‐scale synthesis, the CeO 2 ‐P was chosen as the support of Ni/CeO 2 catalyst prepared by impregnation method as follows: 0.165 g of Ni(NO 3 ) 2 ·6H 2 O was dissolved into 20 mL of deionized water and then mixed with 0.300 g of bulk CeO 2 support and stirred for 6 hr; using rotary evaporator to gradually remove water, the sample powder was left to completely dry overnight followed by calcination at 600 °C for 4 hr, 28 which marked as Ni/CeO 2 ‐I.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recycling CO 2 to produce fuels such as methane, methanol, dimethyl ether, or higher alcohols could be a convenient alternative that has not been thoroughly investigated yet. Research in this field may leads to reduced consumption of carbon-based fossil fuels, avoiding the introduction of new CO 2 to the atmosphere [2,3]. The hydrogenation of CO 2 to produce methane and water, (CO 2 + 4H 2 → CH 4 + 2H 2 O), known as Sabatier reaction or methanation, is exothermic (∆H • = -164 kJ mol −1 ), and thermodynamically favored (∆G 0 = -131 kJ/mol), but with kinetic barriers that require the presence of a catalyst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CeO 2 can be prepared in different nano-shapes, such as nano-rod, nano-cubic or nanooctahedra. The morphology affects the catalytic performances of Me/CeO 2 catalysts for various reactions: i.e., CO 2 methanation over Ni [3,25], methane combustion over Pd [17], water gas shift reaction over Cu [26], dry reforming of methane or methanol over Ni [27,28], hydrogenation of ethyl levulinate over Ru [21]. The nano-rod morphology appears the most active and stable for all these reactions, whereas the order of activity for nano-cubes and nano-octahedra may be reversed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the work of Tsiotsias et al (2020) [30], it was shown that the incorporation of alkaline and alkaline earth metals increases the alkalinity of the support, facilitates the chemisorption of CO 2 , increases the population of oxygen vacancies on the surface of the metal oxide, and improves the dispersion of the metal on the support. Jomjaree et al [31] prepared Ni/CeO 2 nanostructured catalysts with tunable CeO 2 morphology/structure determining the influence in increasing oxygen vacancies and oxygen storage capacity, and their influence on catalytic activity enhancement between 473 and 773 K under atmospheric pressure. Cardenas-Arenas et al [29] prepared a 3D-ordered macroporous structure of NiO-CeO 2 mixed oxide (NiO-CeO 2 (np)) to achieve high CO 2 methanation conversion due to its high specific surface area if compared with a reference catalyst without size control (NiO-CeO 2 (Ref)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%