2022
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0001988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic Ozonation of Ciprofloxacin with Cu–Al Layered Double Hydroxides Based on Response Surface Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result suggests that OC was not efficiently decomposed in the ozone treatment [ 66 ], while CIP degraded through a large number of intermediates which were easily attacked directly by ozone. Such results were previously reported before in several studies [ 21 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ].
Figure 5 (A) The removal of OC (left panel) and CIP (right panel) using the APO system and the FO system, and (B) the plot of C / C 0 of OC treated using the APO system (black squares) and the FO system (red circles) as a function of treatment time and the best fits of single exponential function.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result suggests that OC was not efficiently decomposed in the ozone treatment [ 66 ], while CIP degraded through a large number of intermediates which were easily attacked directly by ozone. Such results were previously reported before in several studies [ 21 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ].
Figure 5 (A) The removal of OC (left panel) and CIP (right panel) using the APO system and the FO system, and (B) the plot of C / C 0 of OC treated using the APO system (black squares) and the FO system (red circles) as a function of treatment time and the best fits of single exponential function.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This result suggests that OC was not efficiently decomposed in the ozone treatment [66], while CIP degraded through a large number of intermediates which were easily attacked directly by ozone. Such results were previously reported before in several studies [21,66,67,68,69]. A plot of C/C 0 of OC as a function of treatment time t is shown in Figure 5b, revealing that concentration of OC decreased nonlinearly, which is similar to CIP.…”
Section: Organic Carbon Removalsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Also, EPA reports the maximum acceptable concentration in drinking water for MCPA toxin 0.1 μg L −1 . There are several methods for removal of organic and inorganic contaminants such as precipitation [ 13 ], electrochemical [ 14 ], hydrogels [ 15 , 16 ],adsorption [ 17 , 18 ], advanced oxidation processes [ 13 , 19 , 20 ], advanced reduction processes [ [21] , [22] , [23] ], and Ozon/H 2 O 2 [ 24 , 25 ] have been performed [ 26 ]. For persistent organic pollutants (POPs) removal and to enhance treatment, Advanced Oxidation and Reduction processes are effective methods [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%