2017
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201700270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic Effects in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Promoted Sulfur Transformation and Reduced Shuttle Effect

Abstract: Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) battery has emerged as one of the most promising next‐generation energy‐storage systems. However, the shuttle effect greatly reduces the battery cycle life and sulfur utilization, which is great deterrent to its practical use. This paper reviews the tremendous efforts that are made to find a remedy for this problem, mostly through physical or chemical confinement of the lithium polysulfides (LiPSs). Intrinsically, this “confinement” has a relatively limited effect on improving the battery… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
482
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 722 publications
(486 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(69 reference statements)
2
482
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[1,2] However, the commercialization of Li-S batteries is still retarded by the inherent defects of sulfur cathodes, such as the insulating nature of sulfur and solid-state reduction products (Li 2 S 2 and Li 2 S), the dissolution been introduced as the coating layers of the separators, and their stronger chemical interaction with polysulfides has improved electrochemical performance to some degree. [22,23] Fortunately, it is admitted that transition metals and noble metals, such as nickel, cobalt and platinum, possess the catalytic effects on polysulfides, [24][25][26] which not only could effectively suppress shuttle effect of polysulfides through chemical affinity, but also can significantly accelerate the redox reaction of soluble polysulfides. In the cases of high sulfur content and ultralong cycling, the accumulated polysulfides will suffer from sluggish reaction kinetics and will increase the risk on passive blockage of polysulfides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1,2] However, the commercialization of Li-S batteries is still retarded by the inherent defects of sulfur cathodes, such as the insulating nature of sulfur and solid-state reduction products (Li 2 S 2 and Li 2 S), the dissolution been introduced as the coating layers of the separators, and their stronger chemical interaction with polysulfides has improved electrochemical performance to some degree. [22,23] Fortunately, it is admitted that transition metals and noble metals, such as nickel, cobalt and platinum, possess the catalytic effects on polysulfides, [24][25][26] which not only could effectively suppress shuttle effect of polysulfides through chemical affinity, but also can significantly accelerate the redox reaction of soluble polysulfides. In the cases of high sulfur content and ultralong cycling, the accumulated polysulfides will suffer from sluggish reaction kinetics and will increase the risk on passive blockage of polysulfides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16,17] However, the modifications of these separators mainly focus on blocking polysulfides migration through electrostatic repulsion and/or physical/chemical interaction, the intercepted polysulfides could accumulate on the surface of the modified separator. [27] The NPCencapsulated metal nanoparticles (NPs) have been extensively employed as sulfur host materials in Li-S batteries [26,28] and as nanocatalysts in heterogeneous catalysis, [29] but their application as the separator modifiers has not been reported to date. These issues could lead to a relatively limited effect on improving the batteries performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of repeated discharge and charge, lithium ions are prone to form uneven deposition on the surface of lithium metal, which generates lithium dendrites and affects the safety and cyclic stability of devices. [9][10][11] To address this problem, scientists have focused on studying physical blocking and chemical adsorption of the LiPSs in the past years. [6][7][8] However, the long-chain LiPSs are soluble, which can dissolve into the electrolyte and inhibit the reaction kinetics, causing the low utilization of active sulfur and inferior cycling stability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dissolved polysulfides tend to migrate from the cathode to the anode side, causing unwanted parasitic reactions with lithium-metal anode and active-material loss from the sulfur cathode. [21][22][23] Thus, numerous efforts have been focused on the chemical restriction for polysulfides to further improve the electrochemical functionality. [3] Additionally, the degradation of anode and volume changes of sulfur species during reaction also undermine the electrochemical stability and cycle life of Li-S batteries, challenging the practical use of Li-S technology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%