“…Nowadays hydrogen energy featured by high energy value and zero carbon emissions during the utilization has attracted more and more attention around the world, , representing promising solutions to the crises of energy resources − and serious environmental problems raised by carbon emission. − However, the difficulties lying in their storage and transportation restrict its large-scale development. , Toward these practical issues, hydrogenation/dehydrogenation of liquid hydrocarbons, that is, liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHCs), have been viewed as an efficient method, in which H 2 can be stored and transported in ways similar to gasoline and no CO 2 is produced during the whole process, making it capable of being used directly for fuel cells without any further purification . In this respect, the methylcyclohexane–toluene–hydrogen (MCH–TOL–H 2 ) and cyclohexane–benzene–hydrogen (CH–BZ–H 2 ) systems were reported to be highly effective for long-distance transportation and successive utilization as a H 2 source. ,− Now, approaches with intensive energy input (e.g., dehydrogenation temperature >300 °C) are generally required because of the intrinsic high reaction enthalpy (68.3 kJ/mol) in these procedures, , leading to high cost for the H 2 production and devastating efficiencies in the practical utilization of fuel cells (i.e., in nuclear submarines). To achieve energy-efficient and cost-effective H 2 storage and utilization, the key lies in developing catalytic systems with high performance on promoting the dehydrogenation of saturated carriers under mild conditions.…”