1970
DOI: 10.1039/tf9706601485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic activity of haemin. Influence of dissolution conditions on activity

Abstract: Apparent quantitative discrepancies between cataIytic activity data for protohaemin reported in previous investigations have been examined. The effect has been traced to an influence of the conditions of dissolution on the activity of protohaemin solutions. Deuterohaemin shows a similar effect.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The additions ofNaOH (10mM) that were required to maintain the pH during the reactions did not significantly alter the volumes or ionic strengths of the reaction solutions. Ferrihaem solutions were prepared by method A (Brown et al, 1970c). Kinetic studies ofcatalytic activity ofdeuteroferrihaem were made at 25°C, I = 0.1 (added electrolyte NaCI), by measuringthe initial rate ofdecomposition (VI) of solutions which were 4mM with respect to 15 I-I I x I* 0 H202 (after the first 15 % of the reaction).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additions ofNaOH (10mM) that were required to maintain the pH during the reactions did not significantly alter the volumes or ionic strengths of the reaction solutions. Ferrihaem solutions were prepared by method A (Brown et al, 1970c). Kinetic studies ofcatalytic activity ofdeuteroferrihaem were made at 25°C, I = 0.1 (added electrolyte NaCI), by measuringthe initial rate ofdecomposition (VI) of solutions which were 4mM with respect to 15 I-I I x I* 0 H202 (after the first 15 % of the reaction).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specification and methods of assay of materials have been described previously (Brown et al, 1970b;Jones et al, 1973). Deuteroferrihaem solutions were prepared by method A (Brown et al, 1970c). Kinetic spectrophotometric studies were made at 25°C, I = 0.1 (added electrolyte NaCl) in a Durrum-Gibson D-1 10 stopped-flow spectrophotometer.…”
Section: General Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Measured activities were reproducible with both methods and the results may therefore be used comparatively, although the origin of the effect is not understood (Brown et at. 1970c).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are several points of kinetic similarity with aquairon(III) ion and catalase, no detailed basis for a qualitative or quantitative comparison including ferrihaem has been established. Features that complicate the intimate study of ferrihaem catalysis include autoxidation of protoferrihaem (Brown et al 1968), catalyst destruction by the substrate (Brown & Jones, 1968a), variation of catalyst properties with conditions of dissolution (Brown, Dean, Jones & Kremer, 1970c), dimerization and variations in the protolytic state of ferrihaem in aqueous solution (Brown, Dean & Jones, 1970b;Brown, Jones & Lantzke, 1969).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%