1978
DOI: 10.1080/03602457808067529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalyst-Feedstock-Engineering Interactions in Fluid Catalytic Cracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
5

Year Published

1980
1980
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
2
53
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Catalyst activity decreases as the production of coke and hydrogen increase at the expense of gasoline [1]. The presence of metal contaminants on the FCC (fluid catalytic cracking) catalyst has been widely studied by using microscopic and elemental imaging techniques such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [2,3] and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catalyst activity decreases as the production of coke and hydrogen increase at the expense of gasoline [1]. The presence of metal contaminants on the FCC (fluid catalytic cracking) catalyst has been widely studied by using microscopic and elemental imaging techniques such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [2,3] and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 45% of worldwide gasoline production comes either directly from FCC units or indirectly from combination with downstream units, such as alkylation. Venuto (1978) showed the most common FCC feedstock as a blend of gas oils, from vacuum and atmospheric distillation and delayed coking. Due to the inherent desulphurization during cracking reactions, that results of breaking of the C-S bonds in the feedstock.…”
Section: Fig 1: Fluid Catalytic Cracking Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of zeolite containing catalysts caused a revolution in catalytic cracking [65], because of their increased catalytic activity and improved yields to gasoline compared to amorphous silica-alumina catalysts. Mechanistically this has been related by Weisz [66] and others to the more efficient hydrogen redistribution between hydrocarbon molecules over zeolite catalysts, resulting in high rates of intermolecular hydrogen transfer, coupled with extremely high intrinsic cracking activity.…”
Section: Catalyst Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%