1975
DOI: 10.1021/i260053a005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalyst Deactivation Due to Pore-Plugging by Reaction Products

Abstract: ed no heating in order to remove water fed to the reactor and formed during the reaction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This prediction is consistent with the theoretical treatment by Haynes and Leung (1983), and is supported by the results from fuel oil hydrotreatment (Newson, 1975). On the other hand, this conclusion disagrees with that of Masamune and Smith (1966), Murakami et al (1968), Lee and Butt (1973), Polinski et al (1981), and Stiegel et al (1982).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This prediction is consistent with the theoretical treatment by Haynes and Leung (1983), and is supported by the results from fuel oil hydrotreatment (Newson, 1975). On the other hand, this conclusion disagrees with that of Masamune and Smith (1966), Murakami et al (1968), Lee and Butt (1973), Polinski et al (1981), and Stiegel et al (1982).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Their results show that when pore plugging as well as active site poisoning is considered, the catalysts with lower diffusional resistance are more advantageous than those with higher resistance in terms of activity and life of the catalysts. Newson (1975) proposed a pore-plugging model to describe hydrotreatment catalyst deactivation in axial flow trickle-bed reactors. In his model he assumed a Maxwellian pore size distribution and a parallel fouling reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the reaction temperature in this study was set to 600 °C to study the coking behavior, which is one of the DRM main issues. Carbon deposition during DRM is known to cause catalyst deactivation and reactor plugging [53]. High WHSV (170 L/(gcat × h)) was applied to clearly discriminate the coking resistance among the catalysts.…”
Section: Catalyst Performance In the Drm Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a previous DRM review [49], carbon formation occurs due to methane decomposition (MD) above 550 • C as well as the Boudouard (BD) reaction below 700 • C. Therefore, the reaction temperature in this study was set to 600 • C to study the coking behavior, which is one of the DRM main issues. Carbon deposition during DRM is known to cause catalyst deactivation and reactor plugging [53]. High WHSV (170 L/(g cat × h)) was applied to clearly discriminate the coking resistance among the catalysts.…”
Section: Catalyst Performance In the Drm Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation