2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalysis of the electrochemical H evolution by di-iron sub-site models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
183
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
7
183
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the presence of acetic acid (HOAc) both complexes are efficient electrocatalysts for the reduction of protons to molecular hydrogen (acetonitrile, glassy carbon cathode, SI Appendix), in line with previous observations (18). The electrocatalytic proton reduction potentials coincide with the Fe 0 Fe I reduction of complexes 1 and 2, being shifted 500 mV less negatively than the proton reduction under identical conditions (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the presence of acetic acid (HOAc) both complexes are efficient electrocatalysts for the reduction of protons to molecular hydrogen (acetonitrile, glassy carbon cathode, SI Appendix), in line with previous observations (18). The electrocatalytic proton reduction potentials coincide with the Fe 0 Fe I reduction of complexes 1 and 2, being shifted 500 mV less negatively than the proton reduction under identical conditions (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The elucidation of the protein structure of the [2Fe2S]hydrogenases revealed their active center (14), which has served as a huge impetus for synthetic chemists exploring properties of its structural models (15)(16)(17). It has already been demonstrated that several of these models are active electrocatalysts, producing molecular hydrogen when a certain cathodic potential is applied (18). † The structure of the Fe 2 (-S 2 ) core appears crucial for this activity, but the remaining ligands attached to the active site, in the natural systems generally CO, CN Ϫ , and thiolate-sulfur, can be replaced without much consequence (although the cyanide ligand can be protonated to [Fe]CNH) (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in this area have afforded molecular electrocatalysts that employ cobalt, molybdenum, nickel, or iron [6][7][8][9][10][11], instead of platinum that is currently the preferred electrocatalyst for proton reduction in water [12]. Given the interest of developing H 2 -production electrocatalysts based on cheap and abundant materials, synthetic models of the iron-iron hydrogenase enzymes have been the subject of numerous studies [13][14][15][16][17][18]. Diiron-dithiolate compounds of the type [Fe 2 (µ-SRS)(CO) 6-x L x ] (R = organic group, L = electron-donor ligand, x ≤ 4) have been shown to electrocatalyze the reduction of acid in organic solvents [19][20][21] and, very recently, in aqueous micellar solutions [22,23](for examples of photo-driven H 2 -production by diiron-dithiolate compounds see [24,25]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dithiolate-bridged diiron complexes of the type [Fe 2 (CO) 6 -(l-dithiolate)] have been intensely studied [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] due to their structural resemblance with the two-iron unit of the H-cluster active site of [FeFe]-hydrogenases, enzymes that catalyse the reversible interconversion of protons-electrons and hydrogen. A key step in electrocatalytic proton reduction is protonation of the diiron centre, but [Fe 2 (CO) 6 (l-dithiolate)] complexes are not basic enough to undergo protonation except by extremely strong acids [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%