1995
DOI: 10.1021/ja00151a013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalysis and Mass Transport in Spatially Ordered Enzyme Assemblies on Electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
84
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
84
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reversible behavior is consistent with a large standard rate constant of ferrocene derivatives at carbon electrodes, e.g., k 0 = 0.19 cm/s for ferrocenemethanol at a glassy carbon electrode. 41 The geometrical parameters of b/a and RG in the best fits are consistent with those determined by optical microscopy. The current approach curve obtained with the 25 μm-diameter probe also fits with a theoretical curve for an insulating substrate, indicating that the unbiased substrate is too small in comparison with the probe diameter to regenerate the mediator.…”
Section: Finite Substrate Effectsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The reversible behavior is consistent with a large standard rate constant of ferrocene derivatives at carbon electrodes, e.g., k 0 = 0.19 cm/s for ferrocenemethanol at a glassy carbon electrode. 41 The geometrical parameters of b/a and RG in the best fits are consistent with those determined by optical microscopy. The current approach curve obtained with the 25 μm-diameter probe also fits with a theoretical curve for an insulating substrate, indicating that the unbiased substrate is too small in comparison with the probe diameter to regenerate the mediator.…”
Section: Finite Substrate Effectsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Such high enzyme loadings of glucose oxidase could be achieved with SAM enzyme electrodes if a number of single molecule thick enzyme layers are deposited by exploiting some of the recently developed step-by-step immobilization techniques. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Such an approach could then lead to a transport limited enzyme electrode being fabricated in a highly controlled manner, thus exploiting the highly controlled immobilization virtues of the SAM approach with the advantages of transport limitation.…”
Section: What Limits the Response Of The Sam Enzyme Electrode?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using SAMs has the potential to provide enzyme electrodes with a high degree of reproducibility, 1,2 molecular level control over the spatial distribution of the immobilized enzymes [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and the immobilization of the enzyme close to the electrode thus allowing direct electron transfer to be achieved. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] These advantages have resulted in a recent surge in research into self-assembled monolayers for biosensor applications in general, and enzyme electrodes in particular.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A larger peak separation, and a larger increase in the peak separation for a hexacyanoferrate (II/III) couple might be additionally due to the lower electron transfer rate (k 0 =0.03 cm/s [36,37]) than that for ferrocenemethanol (k 0 =0.2 cm/s [36,38]) because of the bridge transition state pathway in the electron transfer in the anion redox process and complex reorganization, where the rate of the bridge-assisted electron transfer is higher than that of the direct electron transfer. However, this three-body problem in electron transfer is not within the scope of the present work and may require further investigations [39][40][41].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%