“…For instance, according to Louis Stulman and Hyun Chul Paul Kim (2010:5–6), the literary codification of biblical prophecy may be characterized as a transformative process in which scribes reconfigured past images of horror, imbuing them with new meaning for survivors in an imperial age (see also Stulman, 1998:101). Similarly, Marti Nissinen (2017:152) posits that the scribal activity of the Second Temple period found its impetus in the need to “overcome socio-religious crises caused by changes in the public and ideological structure of society,” and one method for addressing these crises was “restructuring the symbolic universe…by reusing and interpreting older prophecies, and even creating new ones” (see also Stulman, 1998:119). Furthermore, Kathleen O’Connor (2011:x, 31–34, 135) notes in her work concerning Jeremiah that this restructuring of symbols and metaphors likely constituted for its readership a means of survival , expressing disaster-related anxieties while also providing a semblance of order to abstract memories (see also Stulman, 2014:7; Carr, 2014:6, 162, 244–45; Silverman, 2015:439).…”