2016
DOI: 10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalogs of Compact Groups of Galaxies From the Enhanced SDSS Dr12

Abstract: We apply a friends-of-friends algorithm to an enhanced SDSS DR12 spectroscopic catalog including redshift from literature to construct a catalog of 1588 N ≥ 3 compact groups of galaxies containing 5179 member galaxies and covering the redshift range 0.01 < z < 0.19. This catalog contains 18 times as many systems and reaches 3 times the depth of similar catalog of Barton et al. (1996). We construct catalogs from both magnitude-limited and volume-limited galaxy samples. Like Barton et al. (1996) we omit the freq… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
2
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This methodology has been used to construct similar catalogues using surveys such as the COSMOS-UKST Southern Galaxy Catalogue (Iovino 2002), 2MASS (Díaz-Giménez et al 2012Zandivarez 2015), andSDSS (McConnachie et al 2009). Compact groups have also been identified using the FoF algorithm on surveys such as the CfA2 (Barton et al 1996), and SDSS (Sohn et al 2016); however, incompleteness due to fibre collsions particularly disrupts dense, compact structures, such as compact groups. Recent work has advocated for combining the two selection methods, for example, Díaz-Giménez et al (2018) using SDSS, and Zheng & Shen (2020) who combined redshift information from SDSS, LAMOST, and GAMA.…”
Section: Compactnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology has been used to construct similar catalogues using surveys such as the COSMOS-UKST Southern Galaxy Catalogue (Iovino 2002), 2MASS (Díaz-Giménez et al 2012Zandivarez 2015), andSDSS (McConnachie et al 2009). Compact groups have also been identified using the FoF algorithm on surveys such as the CfA2 (Barton et al 1996), and SDSS (Sohn et al 2016); however, incompleteness due to fibre collsions particularly disrupts dense, compact structures, such as compact groups. Recent work has advocated for combining the two selection methods, for example, Díaz-Giménez et al (2018) using SDSS, and Zheng & Shen (2020) who combined redshift information from SDSS, LAMOST, and GAMA.…”
Section: Compactnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FoF algorithm have been used to build galaxy group catalogues for most major astronomical surveys, including Sloan Digital Sky Survey (Merchán & Zandivarez 2005;Berlind et al 2006;Deng et al 2007;Tago et al 2008Tago et al , 2010Muñoz-Cuartas & Müller 2012;Tempel et al 2012Tempel et al , 2014bTempel et al , 2017Sohn et al 2016), GAMA (Robotham et al 2011), Millennium Galaxy and Group Catalogue (Calvi et al 2011), and 2dF galaxy redshift survey (Merchán & Zandivarez 2002;Eke et al 2004;Tago et al 2006). FoF algorithm has a long history in astronomy and it is actively used since Turner & Gott (1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the limitations in volume, if the projected distance between individual members is very small (as typical for CGs) both observations and simulations are prone to missing group members in different ways. While redshift dependent fiber collision and blending (see discussions in Mamon 2010 andSohn et al 2016) can occur in observations, the exact identification of close pair members (major mergers) depends on the substructure finder used in 3 The halo mass M 200,crit is defined as the mass that encloses a mean density of 200 times the critical density of the Universe. simulations (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%