2018
DOI: 10.7554/elife.32341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CATaDa reveals global remodelling of chromatin accessibility during stem cell differentiation in vivo

Abstract: During development eukaryotic gene expression is coordinated by dynamic changes in chromatin structure. Measurements of accessible chromatin are used extensively to identify genomic regulatory elements. Whilst chromatin landscapes of pluripotent stem cells are well characterised, chromatin accessibility changes in the development of somatic lineages are not well defined. Here we show that cell-specific chromatin accessibility data can be produced via ectopic expression of E. coli Dam methylase in vivo, without… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
77
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although previous studies have demonstrated a global reduction in chromatin accessibility and/or plasticity during lineage commitment in specific developmental settings (e.g. embryonic stem cells, intestinal stem cells, and neural stem cells 35,36,38,64 ), our quantitative findings extend the scope of this result. Moreover, as has been previously shown 65 , our data indicate that variability in gene counts between phenotypically identical single cells is not exclusively due to drop-out events, but also due to differential sampling of the transcriptome (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although previous studies have demonstrated a global reduction in chromatin accessibility and/or plasticity during lineage commitment in specific developmental settings (e.g. embryonic stem cells, intestinal stem cells, and neural stem cells 35,36,38,64 ), our quantitative findings extend the scope of this result. Moreover, as has been previously shown 65 , our data indicate that variability in gene counts between phenotypically identical single cells is not exclusively due to drop-out events, but also due to differential sampling of the transcriptome (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Since the transcriptional output of a cell is associated with its genome-wide chromatin profile, we hypothesized that single-cell gene counts might ultimately be a surrogate for global chromatin accessibility, which has been previously shown to decrease with differentiation [35][36][37][38] . To test this, we compared single-cell gene counts derived from scRNA-seq data with paired bulk ATAC-seq (assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing) profiles obtained from a recent study of in vitro mesodermal differentiation from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) 32 ( Fig.…”
Section: Robustness and Biological Basis Of Gene Countsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We designed MaTaDa to take advantage of the large collection of Cre-expressing constructs, cell lines and model organisms for targeted expression in vivo. As has been demonstrated in Drosophila (Cheetham and Brand, 2018;Marshall and Brand, 2017;Southall et al, 2013;Aughey et al, 2018), the generation of MaTaDa transgenic animals for key transcription factors, lncRNAs, chromatin complexes and RNA polymerase II will permit the characterisation of the molecular landscape of gene regulation in almost any cell type. Analysing the interactions between transcription factors and enhancers in small and pure populations of stem cells in vivo will be of vital importance for an increased understanding of the transcriptional control of development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this range of methylation, DamID is unlikely to reach the resolution offered by ChIP-based techniques; DamID is not, however, constrained by the same input limitations, and has been used to profile transcription factor binding from 1000 ES cells (Tosti et al 2018) and even single cells (Lai et al 2019). Although ChIP-seq (and more recently, CUT&RUN) has largely superseded DamID for factor localization, DamID is becoming more popular in studying broader chromatin features; for instance, Chromatin Accessibility Targeted DamID (CATaDA) has been developed to assess open chromatin (Aughey et al 2018). CATaDa utilizes an untethered Dam protein to methylate regions of open chromatin, leaving nucleosome-bound DNA unmethylated (Aughey et al 2018).…”
Section: Damidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ChIP-seq (and more recently, CUT&RUN) has largely superseded DamID for factor localization, DamID is becoming more popular in studying broader chromatin features; for instance, Chromatin Accessibility Targeted DamID (CATaDA) has been developed to assess open chromatin (Aughey et al 2018). CATaDa utilizes an untethered Dam protein to methylate regions of open chromatin, leaving nucleosome-bound DNA unmethylated (Aughey et al 2018). Split DamID has also been used to profile cooccupancy of two proteins at genomic loci, acting in a similar manner to a yeast two-hybrid screen (Hass et al 2015), and a catalytically inactive DpnI-GFP fusion construct has been used to examine Dam-driven GATC methylation in real-time using microscopy (Kind et al 2015).…”
Section: Damidmentioning
confidence: 99%