2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14453.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cassiopeia A: dust factory revealed via submillimetre polarimetry

Abstract: If Type-II supernovae - the evolutionary end points of short-lived, massive stars - produce a significant quantity of dust (>0.1 M_sun) then they can explain the rest-frame far-infrared emission seen in galaxies and quasars in the first Gyr of the Universe. Submillimetre observations of the Galactic supernova remnant, Cas A, provided the first observational evidence for the formation of significant quantities of dust in Type-II supernovae. In this paper we present new data which show that the submm emission fr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
124
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
9
124
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The "maximum" SN efficiency originates from theoretical SN dust formation models, and corresponds to dust masses of approximately 3-10 × 10 −1 M . Similar dust masses have been observed in SN remnants such as Cas A (e.g., Dunne et al 2009) or Kepler (e.g., Gomez et al 2009). Dust destruction in reverse shock interaction of about 93% has been applied to the "maximum" SN efficiency, to obtain the "high" SN efficiency.…”
Section: The Modelsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The "maximum" SN efficiency originates from theoretical SN dust formation models, and corresponds to dust masses of approximately 3-10 × 10 −1 M . Similar dust masses have been observed in SN remnants such as Cas A (e.g., Dunne et al 2009) or Kepler (e.g., Gomez et al 2009). Dust destruction in reverse shock interaction of about 93% has been applied to the "maximum" SN efficiency, to obtain the "high" SN efficiency.…”
Section: The Modelsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…There is only little observational evidence that SNe can be very efficient (e.g., Wilson & Batrla 2005;Douvion et al 2001;Dunne et al 2009), and theoretical models predict significant dust destruction in reverse shocks of SNe (e.g., Bianchi & Schneider 2007;Nozawa et al 2007Nozawa et al , 2010. On the other hand, these models also show that the effectiveness of dust destruction depends on various properties such as the geometry of the shocks, the density of the ejecta and the ISM, the size and shape of the grains, clumping in the SNe ejecta, and different SN types.…”
Section: Sn Efficiency and Mass Of The Galaxymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that a typical 20 M star now produces nearly 0.08 M of dust. This is 2-3 times higher than the maximum amount of warm dust observed in SNII (Rho et al 2008(Rho et al , 2009), yet lower than the most recent estimates of the cold dust mass in the Kepler and CasA SN remnants (Gomez et al 2009;Dunne et al 2009). The dust "yields" as a function of stellar mass for SNeII are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Dust Productionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In fact, while submillimetre observations of the Kepler and CasA SN remnants yield 0.1-1 M of dust (e.g. Morgan et al 2003;Dunne et al 2009;Gomez et al 2009), infrared observations give 0.1 M of dust (Helmhamdi et al 2003;Sugerman et al 2006;Kotak et al 2009;Rho et al 2008Rho et al , 2009Meikle et al 2007;Takaya et al 2008). A possibility is that such a discrepancy could be traced back to a difference in the instrument sensitivity to the different dust phases (cold for submillimetre, warm for Spitzer).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying dust formation models are sensitive to assumptions about the parameters controlling the dust grain properties (such as morphology, size, or composition; Gall et al 2011c;Fallest et al 2011) which determine the shape and characteristics of extinction curves (see Section 6.5). Furthermore, dust grains produced by SNe will be subject to either disruptive, destructive, or growth processes due to, for example, shock interactions in the SN remnant (e.g., Bianchi & Schneider 2007;Nozawa et al 2007;Dunne et al 2009;Matsuura et al 2011) or the interstellar medium (e.g., Draine 2009;Michałowski et al 2010a), or due to reprocessing by the intense UV radiation in star-forming regions. Any modifications of the original dust grains formed by SNe will lead to changes in either the mineralogy or the grainsize distribution of the dust, and hence the resulting extinction law (e.g., Hirashita & Kuo 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%