2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-015-0776-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cassava peel as a replacement for corn in the diet of lactating cows

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the replacement of corn with cassava peel in the diets of dairy cows. Eight Holstein cows were used. The experimental treatments consisted of four replacement levels of corn with cassava peel (0, 33, 66, and 100 %). The replacement of corn with cassava peel linearly decreased the intake and digestibility of dry matter and organic matter, but did not alter the intake of neutral detergent fiber and crude protein. In addition, there was a linear decrease in milk… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the challenge that cassava root begins to spoil from 2 days after harvest due to physiological changes and microbial activity, unless kept under special storage condition [36], fresh cassava peel (M. esculenta Crantz) contains phytates and large quantities of toxic cyanogenic glycosides [37]. Feeding of fresh cassava roots may lead to cyanide toxicity, depending on the cyanide content in the roots, and thus should be processed in order to reduce cyanogenic and phytate contents [38] before being used as feed for poultry.…”
Section: Effect Of Feeding Raw/unprocessed Cassava To Poultrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the challenge that cassava root begins to spoil from 2 days after harvest due to physiological changes and microbial activity, unless kept under special storage condition [36], fresh cassava peel (M. esculenta Crantz) contains phytates and large quantities of toxic cyanogenic glycosides [37]. Feeding of fresh cassava roots may lead to cyanide toxicity, depending on the cyanide content in the roots, and thus should be processed in order to reduce cyanogenic and phytate contents [38] before being used as feed for poultry.…”
Section: Effect Of Feeding Raw/unprocessed Cassava To Poultrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Santos et al (2015) using cassava peel acquired from the starch industry for lactating cows, verified linear decrease on the intake and digestibility of DM, due to increase in the NDF and ADF contents in the rations. However, there are few studies with cassava peel obtained from Family Farming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In some studies, such as Santos et al (2015), although the similar content of NDF in the diets (430-490 g/kg DM), the cassava peel was acquired from the flour industry, and this residues generally are composed by higher fiber content, which could explain linear decrease on the intake and digestibility of dry matter. In the same way, Menezes et al (2004) verified that the replacement of corn with cassava peel promoted decrease in the nutrient intake in goats, attributed to the high NDF content (549-610 g/kg DM) in the diets, associating this fact to lowest passing rate of the NDF in relation to the others dietary constituents, promoting rumen-reticulum filling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Howeverthe low use of cassava silage in animal feed is related to the lack of knowledge of its nutritional levels and the actual potential of crop residues for use in the feeding and production of ruminants (Silva et al, 2015a;Polyorach et al, 2016). In addition the use of cassava silage is limited by its low dry matter (DM) content (220-250 g/kg) which causes difficulties in fermenting the silage (Santos et al 2015). Another important factor relevant to the ensiling process is the high crude protein (CP) content of cassava (205 g/kg DM) which can lead to a buffering effect that hinders the reduction of the pH to levels optimal for silage fermentation (Fernandes et al, 2016;Ampapon et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%