2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caspase-8 and caspase-3 small interfering RNA decreases ischemia/reperfusion injury to the liver in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
85
0
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
85
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential utility of siRNA sequences as therapeutic agents has been previously described in the literature (11,21,25). The liver, in particular, seems an ideal target organ for RNA interference, due in part to its reticuloendothelial function and relative ease of transfection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The potential utility of siRNA sequences as therapeutic agents has been previously described in the literature (11,21,25). The liver, in particular, seems an ideal target organ for RNA interference, due in part to its reticuloendothelial function and relative ease of transfection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, systemic application of caspase-8 siRNA inhibits caspase-8 expression in mouse liver and is capable of preventing Fas (CD95)-mediated apoptosis of hepatocytes (24). Intraportal administration of siRNA caspase-8 and caspase-3 inhibits the expression of caspase-8 and caspase-3 and attenuates warm IRI to the liver (25). siRNA targeting Fas has been shown to protect mice against renal IRI (26).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings can be translated into therapeutic use for liver protection in many conditions, such as liver transplantation, partial hepatectomy, shock, sepsis and acute liver failure of other etiologies. Hence, neutralization of CD95L may serve as a new targeted therapy to attenuate liver ischemia reperfusion injury [53][54][55][56][57][58][59] . Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%