Casirivimab + imdevimab accelerates symptom resolution linked to improved COVID-19 outcomes across susceptible antibody and risk profiles
Dateng Li,
Meng Xu,
Andrea T. Hooper
et al.
Abstract:Severe, protracted symptoms are associated with poor outcomes in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. In a placebo-controlled study of casirivimab and imdevimab (CAS + IMD) in persons at high risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19; n = 3816), evolution of individual symptoms was assessed for resolution patterns across risk factors, and baseline SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses against S1 and N domains. CAS + IMD versus placebo provided statistically significa… Show more
“…30 On the other hand, the importance of antibody-mediated antiviral effects has been demonstrated, e.g., via the high efficacy of treatment of symptomatic infections with S protein-targeting mAbs at a time when the virus had not yet drifted towards Omicron. 31 Intuitively, this mechanism is especially important for agammaglobulinemia patients who are not able to mount an own antibody response.…”
Section: Covid-19 Cases In Immunocompromised Patients and Sars-cov-2 ...mentioning
Immunocompromised individuals are at significantly elevated risk for severe courses of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). In addition to vaccination, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) have been applied throughout the pandemic, with time of treatment onset and potency against the currently prevailing virus variant identified as relevant factors for medical benefit. Using data from the European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) registry, the present study evaluated COVID‐19 cases in three groups of patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI; 981 agammaglobulinemia patients on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT); 8960 non‐agammaglobulinemia patients on IGRT; 14 428 patients without IGRT), and the neutralizing capacity of 1100 immunoglobulin lots against SARS‐CoV‐2 (“Wuhan” and Omicron strains), throughout 3 years. From the first (2020/2021) to the second (2021/2022) cold season, i.e., during the virus drift to the more contagious Omicron variants, an increase in case numbers was recorded that was comparable (~2‐ to 3‐fold) for all three study groups. During the same period, immunoglobulin lots showed a profound nAb increase against the archetypal SARS‐CoV‐2 strain, yet only low levels of Omicron nAbs. Notably, shortly before the third (2022/2023) cold season, Omicron‐neutralizing capacity of released immunoglobulin lots had plateaued at high levels. From the second to the third cold season, COVID‐19 cases dropped markedly. While a ~6‐fold case reduction was recorded for the groups of non‐agammaglobulinemia patients on IGRT and IEI patients not receiving IGRT, the decline was ~30‐fold for the group of agammaglobulinemia patients on IGRT. These findings suggest a substantial COVID‐19‐protective effect of IGRT, at least for distinct groups of antibody‐deficient patients.
“…30 On the other hand, the importance of antibody-mediated antiviral effects has been demonstrated, e.g., via the high efficacy of treatment of symptomatic infections with S protein-targeting mAbs at a time when the virus had not yet drifted towards Omicron. 31 Intuitively, this mechanism is especially important for agammaglobulinemia patients who are not able to mount an own antibody response.…”
Section: Covid-19 Cases In Immunocompromised Patients and Sars-cov-2 ...mentioning
Immunocompromised individuals are at significantly elevated risk for severe courses of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). In addition to vaccination, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) have been applied throughout the pandemic, with time of treatment onset and potency against the currently prevailing virus variant identified as relevant factors for medical benefit. Using data from the European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) registry, the present study evaluated COVID‐19 cases in three groups of patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI; 981 agammaglobulinemia patients on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT); 8960 non‐agammaglobulinemia patients on IGRT; 14 428 patients without IGRT), and the neutralizing capacity of 1100 immunoglobulin lots against SARS‐CoV‐2 (“Wuhan” and Omicron strains), throughout 3 years. From the first (2020/2021) to the second (2021/2022) cold season, i.e., during the virus drift to the more contagious Omicron variants, an increase in case numbers was recorded that was comparable (~2‐ to 3‐fold) for all three study groups. During the same period, immunoglobulin lots showed a profound nAb increase against the archetypal SARS‐CoV‐2 strain, yet only low levels of Omicron nAbs. Notably, shortly before the third (2022/2023) cold season, Omicron‐neutralizing capacity of released immunoglobulin lots had plateaued at high levels. From the second to the third cold season, COVID‐19 cases dropped markedly. While a ~6‐fold case reduction was recorded for the groups of non‐agammaglobulinemia patients on IGRT and IEI patients not receiving IGRT, the decline was ~30‐fold for the group of agammaglobulinemia patients on IGRT. These findings suggest a substantial COVID‐19‐protective effect of IGRT, at least for distinct groups of antibody‐deficient patients.
Introduction
This study aimed to assess the effects of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) combination on symptoms, daily function, and overall health-related quality of life.
Methods
We analyzed patient-reported outcomes data from symptomatic outpatients in a phase 1/2/3 trial. Patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and ≥ 1 risk factor for severe COVID-19 received mAb treatment (casirivimab plus imdevimab 1200 mg) or placebo. Prespecified exploratory assessments included time to sustained symptoms resolution, usual health, and return to usual activities (assessed daily for 29 days). The trial was conducted from September 2020 to February 2021, prior to widespread COVID-19 vaccination programs and Omicron-lineage variants against which casirivimab + imdevimab is not active.
Results
In this analysis 736 outpatients received mAb and 1341 received placebo. Median time to sustained symptoms resolution was consistently shorter with mAb versus placebo (≥ 2 consecutive days: 14 vs 17 days, [nominal
p
= 0.0017]; ≥ 3 consecutive days: 17 vs 21 days, [nominal
p
= 0.0046]). Median time to sustained return to usual health and usual activities were both consistently shorter with mAb versus placebo (≥ 2 consecutive days: 12 vs 15 days [nominal
p
= 0.0001] and 9 vs 11 days [nominal
p
= 0.0001], respectively; ≥ 3 consecutive days: 14 vs 18 days [nominal
p
= 0.0003] and 10 vs 13 days [nominal
p
= 0.0041], respectively).
Conclusions
mAb treatment against susceptible SARS-CoV-2 strains improved how patients feel and function, as evidenced by shortened time to sustained symptoms resolution and return to usual health and activities. Future studies are warranted to assess the patient experience with next generation mAbs.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registration number, NCT04425629; Submission date June 11, 2020.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-024-01013-1.
In this research, we explore the impact of edge passivation using halogen atoms on armchair stanene nanoribbon (ASNR) for the early detection of lung cancer biomarkers. We employ nonequilibrium Green...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.