1996
DOI: 10.1006/aphy.1996.0111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Casimir Effect for a Perfectly Conducting Wedge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(These results were later discussed in Ref. [213].) Although for perfectly conducting flat surfaces, the energy density is finite, for electromagnetism the individual electric and magnetic fields have divergent RMS values,…”
Section: Surface and Volume Divergencesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…(These results were later discussed in Ref. [213].) Although for perfectly conducting flat surfaces, the energy density is finite, for electromagnetism the individual electric and magnetic fields have divergent RMS values,…”
Section: Surface and Volume Divergencesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Therefore the objections against using this formula brought up in Ref. [3] are obviously not applicable here. As a result, we obtain…”
Section: Local Zeta Function For Perfectly Conducting Wedgementioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is discussed in the literature for a long time (see, for example, Refs. [2,3,21]). When defining the global quantities in the problem at hand, we simply introduce a cutoff at the lower limit of integration over r. Thus for the total energy we have…”
Section: Local Zeta Function For Perfectly Conducting Wedgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) with the electromagnetic energy-momentum in the wedge [2,3,4] T µν = 1 720π 2 r 4 π 2 α 2 + 11 π 2 α 2 − 1 diag(1, −3, 1, 1), (1.4) we see that β corresponds to p. Hence the deficit angle Φ corresponds to 2π − 2α. We shall return to this analogy later.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%