Cash Transfer Programmes For Reducing Poverty And Vulnerabilities: Effects On Children’s Health In Sub-Saharan Africa And Latin America

Abstract

This paper summarizes the arguments and counterarguments within the scientific discussion on cash transfers and child health. The main purpose of the research is to assess the effects of cash transfers on children’s health and development outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. Systematization of the literary sources indicates that studies have justified cash transfer as social-income support that addresses a vital social determinant of health (income) for children in low-and-middle-income countries. The methodological basis of this study is a systematic review that searched a wide range of electronic databases such as PubMed, ResearchGate and ScienceDirect. Studies included in this review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-RCTs, quasi-experimental and mixed methods studies of cash transfer interventions in children 0-18 years. Inclusion criteria were met by eight studies, four from Africa and four from Latin America. The systematic review presents the results of data synthesis of the included studies that mainly reported the effects of cash transfer programmes on child anthropometry outcomes, cognitive development, morbidity, and healthcare utilization. The review found cash transfer programmes to improve these variables among children in households receiving cash transfers. This systematic review has added to the debate on cash transfers and children’s health outcomes. In general, the systematic review indicates that cash transfer programmes intended for children are effective at improving anthropometric, health, and cognitive outcomes, as well as access to healthcare. However, there is a need for more research to clarify the multiple pathways by which cash transfers can improve children’s health and nutritional outcomes. It is also necessary to clarify what factors explain the variety of effects of cash transfer programs on child health and nutritional status. Finally, cash transfer interventions are not permanent mechanisms for promoting access to healthcare. Policymakers in developing countries should borrow ideas on how to finance healthcare services for improving the socio-economic wellbeing of citizens.

The Behavioral and Social Dimension of the Public Health System of European Countries: Descriptive, Canonical, and Factor Analysis

“…Zhang L. et al [39], Kuzior A. et al [40], Rajan D. [41], Awojobi O.N. [42], Hinrichs G. et al [43], and Kadar B. et al [44] are other notable works employing factor analysis. Social sciences researchers also use the factor analysis method in their work (6.48%).…”

Interaction between health insurance, household income, and public health financing in Ukraine

“…In particular, a more advanced interaction model between stakeholders of voluntary health insurance was proposed. Awojobi (2021Awojobi ( , 2022 provides a detailed review of the evidence on the impact of the Social Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana and other African countries on improving access to healthcare, reducing poverty, and improving overall living standards. Finally, Mrabet et al (2022) determined the relationship between indicators of quality of healthcare services and patient satisfaction with the health sector by the example of the survey results among patients in one of the towns of Algeria.…”

“…With this level of state financial support for the health care industry of Ukraine, the most attractive is the insurance company operating in Ukraine, UNIQA PrJSC IC.The obtained results can be used both by insurance companies during the management of insurance premiums and payments and at the level of state management of costs in the healthcare. ://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(4).2022 33. Payment matrix of the game, where insurance companies and households are the players Source: Authors' calculations.…”