1998
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5957.00218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cash Management Behavior and Failure Prediction

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the information contained in static and dynamic inventory cash management models to predict failure in a sample of 41 small and middle-sized Finnish bankrupt firms and their nonbankrupt counterparts. The results indicate that the estimates of the (scale) elasticity of cash balance with respect to the volume of transactions (approximated by net sales) is significantly lower for the failed firms. Furthermore, only the scale elasticity appears to be a statistically signifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the aforementioned concepts, belonging to the most commonly used in the field of bankruptcy forecasting, the following approaches can be found in the literature of the subject: rough set theory (Slowinski and Zopounidis 1995), cash management methods (Laitinen and Laitinen 1998), catastrophe theory (Gregory-Allen and Henderson 1991), multicriteria decision aid methodology (Zopounidis and Doumpos 1999), Case-Based Reasoning (Park and Han 2002), Data Envelopment Analysis (Premachandra et al 2009), multidimensional scaling (Molinero and Ezzamel 1991), concepts based on the entropy theory (Bal et al 2013), pattern recognition method (Kolari et al 1996), the self-organizing map method (Kiviluoto 1998;Du Jardin and Séverin 2011), bankruptcy trajectories (Argenti 1976;Du Jardin and Séverin 2010) and opinions of auditors on the continuation of business activity of the surveyed companies (Carson et al 2013).…”
Section: Global Experience-literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the aforementioned concepts, belonging to the most commonly used in the field of bankruptcy forecasting, the following approaches can be found in the literature of the subject: rough set theory (Slowinski and Zopounidis 1995), cash management methods (Laitinen and Laitinen 1998), catastrophe theory (Gregory-Allen and Henderson 1991), multicriteria decision aid methodology (Zopounidis and Doumpos 1999), Case-Based Reasoning (Park and Han 2002), Data Envelopment Analysis (Premachandra et al 2009), multidimensional scaling (Molinero and Ezzamel 1991), concepts based on the entropy theory (Bal et al 2013), pattern recognition method (Kolari et al 1996), the self-organizing map method (Kiviluoto 1998;Du Jardin and Séverin 2011), bankruptcy trajectories (Argenti 1976;Du Jardin and Séverin 2010) and opinions of auditors on the continuation of business activity of the surveyed companies (Carson et al 2013).…”
Section: Global Experience-literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lau (1987) and Ward (1994) develop, respectively, five-state and four-state models of financial distress prior to filing. Recently Laitnen and Laitnen (1998) and Dhumale (1998) use logistic regressions with cash management model and earning retention, respectively, to predict corporate failure. Lennox (1999) discusses the impact of the audit report on bankruptcy prediction.…”
Section: Prior Literature and Incremental Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reflect this, proxies of borrower quality using Dun and Bradstreet (D&B) scores have been proposed by Cavalluzzo et al (2002). Other proxies might be the variance of returns to equity (Booth and Booth, 2006) or cash management behaviour (Laitinen and Laitinen, 1998). None, however, are appropriate measures for the analysis of the effects of private information on financing choices because such information is publicly available and so will underestimate the effects of any information imperfections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%