2019
DOI: 10.1080/01616846.2019.1660755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cases of Censorship in Public Libraries: Loudoun County, VA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same way, Ruschoff 39 reveals the digital environment and challenges to access electronic resources through bibliographic techniques. The results of the study of Steele 40 highlight the censorship in the public libraries in Loudoun County. Further, Michalak and Rysavy 41 focus and mention tools and services for assessing the accessibility of the library.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the same way, Ruschoff 39 reveals the digital environment and challenges to access electronic resources through bibliographic techniques. The results of the study of Steele 40 highlight the censorship in the public libraries in Loudoun County. Further, Michalak and Rysavy 41 focus and mention tools and services for assessing the accessibility of the library.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 90%
“…The library's internet policy was highly restrictive in that it treated adults the same as children. The court ruled that, because the library decided to provide internet access, the First Amendment limited the library board's discretion in placing content-based restrictions on access to the internet, therefore declaring the Loudoun County internet policy invalid (ALA 2006;Steele 2017;Steele 2019a).…”
Section: H I S T O R Y O F C E N S O R S H I P _ F E a T U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%