CASES--clinical audit; scenarios for evaluation and study

Clark, John D.; Kerr, Will; Davis, Margery H.

doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4809434

Cited by 16 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this study, retention duration was measured from the "date of end of treatment/beginning of retention" till the "date of discharge/last review", where, the retention duration was found to be an average of 10 months (307 days) with 2 review appointments during this period. According to a survey carried out in the UK in 1997, the most commonly used retention period was 12 months (Clark et al 1997). In general, at present there are insufficient research data on which to base our clinical practice on retention (Littlewood et al 2006).…”

Section: Retention Regimen and Durationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficiency and effectiveness of orthodontic treatment within United Kingdom secondary care: a service evaluation

Zahran

McDonald

Sherriff

2018

Journal of Orthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Retention Regimen and Durationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficiency and effectiveness of orthodontic treatment within United Kingdom secondary care: a service evaluation

Zahran

McDonald

Sherriff

2018

Journal of Orthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Studies conducted among orthodontists in the UK reveal that the most common retention period is 12 months 12 . This approach was corroborated by histologic studies that have shown that supracrestal periodontal fibers remain stretched and distorted for more than 7 months after cessation of active treatment, suggesting that retention therapy should last for at least 7 months 13,14 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Orthodontist Clinical Experience and Clinical Situation Significantly Influence the Retention Protocol – a Survey from Croatia

Popovic

2020

ACC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim was to assess the views and practice of Croatian orthodontists concerning retention protocols. A total of 150 questionnaire copies were distributed, of which 92 were validly completed. The survey included sociodemographic characteristics, practices of informing patients about retention options, commonly used appliances, and reasons for choosing a particular type of retention and treatment duration. Orthodontists informed patients about retention mostly verbally, the retention period was 3-5 years, the choice of method depended on the malocclusion (76%), and the protocol was influenced by clinical experience of the orthodontist (39%). The most commonly used appliance in the maxilla was the vacuum-formed retainer (52%), whereas a combination of fixed and removable retainers was most common in the mandible (34%). Modus of acquiring knowledge, biological reasons (malocclusion type, oral health, treatment outcome, and growth) and the patient's wishes were not a predictor of retention duration or recall frequency. With an increase in orthodontic experience, the duration of retention decreased and orthodontists were more likely to change the duration of retention (p=0.001), as well as the type of retention appliance (p<0.001). In conclusion, retention protocols among Croatian orthodontists were influenced mostly by their clinical experience and clinical situation.

show abstract

“…Audit projects that have had maximum impact have often been national or regional in nature. When orthodontists, therefore, introduced audit to their discipline through the CASES project, they took a national, collaborative approach to the topic with regional emphasis (2). This approach enabled orthodontists to step outside their individual clinical microcosms and compare their own patient management with that of colleagues both regionally and nationally.…”

Section: Clinical Auditmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Simulated records presenting the history and case records of 6 patients were circulated. Details of the 6 simulated patients are provided in a previous publication (2). Some of the cases deliberately posed important clinical dilemmas and all the cases required participants to take decisions on clinical management (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12).…”

Section: Content Of Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

An evaluation of CASES – an educational audit programme for orthodontists

Davis¹,

Clark

Kerr³

2000

Eur J Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A regional approach to a national clinical audit programme in orthodontics in the UK is described and evaluated. The programme was designed using the CRISIS criteria for effective continuing education. Programme participants completed duplicate questionnaires on 6 simulated patient scenarios, chosen for their relevance to everyday practice while posing important clinical dilemmas. The participation rate was 77% from hospital-based practitioners and 29% from specialist practitioners. Feedback to programme participants was given in the form of histograms, and provided a snapshot of national approaches to patient investigation, treatment and expected outcomes. A commentary on the data and references to appropriate articles in the literature were included. Evaluation of the programme by questionnaire survey showed that it was extensively used by hospital-based practitioners. It is concluded that the model used provided an effective and efficient framework for conducting clinical audit and delivering continuing education to the hospital-based group.

show abstract

CASES--clinical audit; scenarios for evaluation and study

Cited by 16 publications

References 0 publications

Efficiency and effectiveness of orthodontic treatment within United Kingdom secondary care: a service evaluation

Efficiency and effectiveness of orthodontic treatment within United Kingdom secondary care: a service evaluation

Orthodontist Clinical Experience and Clinical Situation Significantly Influence the Retention Protocol – a Survey from Croatia

An evaluation of CASES – an educational audit programme for orthodontists

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About