2019 IEEE 31st International Conference on Tools With Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ictai.2019.00190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cases and Clusters in Reuse Policies for Decision-Making in Card Games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, any agent modeled with such structures has a problem not approached in any know work [Paulus et al 2019, Moral et al 2020, Vargas et al 2021, Rossato et al 2020; as the game rolls the personality of the player or the approach of the agent, can be learned. Such a task is easy for humans but not so for AI.…”
Section: Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, any agent modeled with such structures has a problem not approached in any know work [Paulus et al 2019, Moral et al 2020, Vargas et al 2021, Rossato et al 2020; as the game rolls the personality of the player or the approach of the agent, can be learned. Such a task is easy for humans but not so for AI.…”
Section: Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few works used Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) [Richter and Weber 2013] as an AI framework to solve problems in the game of Truco [Paulus et al 2019, Moral et al 2020, Vargas et al 2021, such approach relies on creating a database of cases for the game, latter exploring the data with different approaches. Specifically, [Paulus et al 2019] did a major comparison between shallow learning approaches, [Vargas et al 2021] built a database focusing on bluff and [Rossato et al 2020], without using CBR, built a lightweight Markov model using the natural force of all possible hands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When card designers need to have their design plans evaluated, they are not looking forward to a simple right or wrong judgment, but to reflect the performance of the design plan on the numerical level from the naturally objective perspective of mathematics itself. This can further improve the designer's comprehension of the difference between one's own subjective new card design and the existing mathematical model of this particular game (Paulus, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%