2023
DOI: 10.3390/app13106010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case Study on Secondary Building Materials for a Greener Economy

Abstract: Half of global material consumption involves mineral material. The circularity is still low so that the enhanced use of secondary building material is required to close loops. Three different secondary building materials are discussed based on exemplary research results: construction and demolition waste (C&D waste), soil-like material, and incineration bottom ash (IBA). Focus was placed on the environmental compatibility of the materials examined mainly by standardized leaching tests. C&D waste was in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the decline in pH in the leaching tests was faster for the outdoor samples than for the samples stored indoor. The alkaline pH values are due to the presence of CaO and Ca(OH) 2 in IBA, which reacts with CO 2 from the air or in rain forming CaCO 3 [47]. As a result, pH values decrease to lower values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further, the decline in pH in the leaching tests was faster for the outdoor samples than for the samples stored indoor. The alkaline pH values are due to the presence of CaO and Ca(OH) 2 in IBA, which reacts with CO 2 from the air or in rain forming CaCO 3 [47]. As a result, pH values decrease to lower values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To save scarce landfill volume, today's aim in thermal waste treatment is to also use the mineral fraction of IBA. The most important use pathway of IBA is as secondary building material [47]. The requirements for the use of IBA in Europe were reviewed by Blasenbauer et al [65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation