1999
DOI: 10.1190/1.1438341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case study of estimation of anisotropy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, several Dix-derived interval parameters η (1,2,3) are too large for shale formations and lie outside the range suggested by laboratory and field studies (Toldi et al, 1999;Wang, 2002). The interval value of η (2) for the first superbin even exceeds unity.…”
Section: Field-data Examplementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, several Dix-derived interval parameters η (1,2,3) are too large for shale formations and lie outside the range suggested by laboratory and field studies (Toldi et al, 1999;Wang, 2002). The interval value of η (2) for the first superbin even exceeds unity.…”
Section: Field-data Examplementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Alkhalifah and Tsvankin (1995) suggested a particularly convenient, simplified form of equation 3.3 for P-waves in VTI media that includes just two moveout parameters, the NMO velocity of horizontal events and the anellipticity parameter η. The Alkhalifah-Tsvankin equation has been widely used for estimating η from nonhyperbolic semblance analysis and for building vertically heterogeneous VTI models in the time domain (e.g., Alkhalifah, 1997;Toldi et al, 1999). Below, this equation is extended to orthorhombic and HTI media by making the NMO velocity and parameter η azimuthally dependent.…”
Section: Nonhyperbolic Moveout Equationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The key issue in anisotropic processing, however, is reliable estimation of the velocity model from reflection data combined with borehole and other information. The parameter η responsible for time processing in VTI media can be obtained by inverting either dip-dependent NMO velocity or nonhyperbolic (longspread) reflection moveout (Alkhalifah and Tsvankin, 1995;Alkhalifah, 1997;Toldi et al, 1999;Fomel, 2004;Ursin and Stovas, 2006). Then the ηfield can be refined in the migrated domain using migration velocity analysis (Sarkar and Tsvankin, 2004) or reflection tomography (Woodward et al, 2008).…”
Section: P-wave Velocity Analysis and Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trade-off between these parameters, however, may lead to sizable errors in η which can reach ±0.1, even for this simple model (Grechka and Tsvankin, 1998). Numerical and field examples of nonhyperbolic moveout analysis of PP-wave data are given by Alkhalifah (1997), Le Bougeant et al (1997), Grechka and Tsvankin (1998), Toldi et al (1999), Tsvankin (2001), and others.…”
Section: Inversion Of Pp Moveout and Conventional-spread Ps Datamentioning
confidence: 99%