Day 2 Tue, October 10, 2017 2017
DOI: 10.2118/187407-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case Study: Multirate Multizone Production Logging and Testing Provides Real-Time Reservoir Insight for Stimulation Treatment Optimization in Deepwater GOM

Abstract: In a deepwater environment, testing of wells can be an expensive process coupled with safety concerns. Properly characterizing a well has a significant impact on asset management. Wells are routinely stimulated to remove formation damage, but subsequent testing to determine the skin after stimulation is rarely performed. This paper discusses a case study where multirate multizone (MRMZ) pressure-transient testing and production logging was performed in a deepwater well in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) to determine … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemical scale accumulation of insoluble mineral salts on water pipeline equipment is a significant problem in the oil field. The mineral deposits can be barium sulfate, calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, iron sulfide and strontium sulfate contributing to faults inflow restriction, equipment wear, costly repair, and maintenance interruptions, thus decreasing the efficiency of chemical processing production [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical scale accumulation of insoluble mineral salts on water pipeline equipment is a significant problem in the oil field. The mineral deposits can be barium sulfate, calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, iron sulfide and strontium sulfate contributing to faults inflow restriction, equipment wear, costly repair, and maintenance interruptions, thus decreasing the efficiency of chemical processing production [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%