2013
DOI: 10.1186/1750-0680-8-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case study for the assessment of the biogeophysical effects of a potential afforestation in Europe

Abstract: BackgroundA regional-scale sensitivity study has been carried out to investigate the climatic effects of forest cover change in Europe. Applying REMO (regional climate model of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology), the projected temperature and precipitation tendencies have been analysed for summer, based on the results of the A2 IPCC-SRES emission scenario simulation. For the end of the 21st century it has been studied, whether the assumed forest cover increase could reduce the effects of the greenhouse … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regional climate models in Europe are often based on comparisons among climate model outputs for different land cover conditions, with the major difference being that forests in one scenario are replaced by open land conditions in another scenario [29]. However, considerable heterogeneity in the climate and topography of Europe has created complex spatial patterns regarding the effects of forests on temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional climate models in Europe are often based on comparisons among climate model outputs for different land cover conditions, with the major difference being that forests in one scenario are replaced by open land conditions in another scenario [29]. However, considerable heterogeneity in the climate and topography of Europe has created complex spatial patterns regarding the effects of forests on temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For box 3, the mean temperature increases with only 0.13 °C. The study of Gálos et al () presented an opposite signal of temperature decrease of −0.4 °C with afforestation for northeast France and northern Germany. This sensitivity study involved a change of only one specific land cover for the far future.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The largest benefit of LULCC can be reached in box 3, where more than half of the increase in the number of extremely warm days could be mitigated by the change to forest cover (value in bold, Table ). This is similar to results for the French region by the end of the century with a land cover scenario of afforestation (Gálos et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations