Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2004
DOI: 10.21236/ada443159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case Study: A Measurement Program for Product Lines

Abstract: Use of any trademarks in this report is not intended in any way to infringe on the rights of the trademark holder. Internal use. Permission to reproduce this document and to prepare derivative works from this document for internal use is granted, provided the copyright and "No Warranty" statements are included with all reproductions and derivative works.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of C drving path for one product is assumed to be "1", while the value of C drving path for the entire product line is seven times as much as an individual product. The cost of making an asset reusable is widely estimated to be 150% of the cost of building the asset for a single use [26,27]. Given the high complexity of MM-path derivation in a product line, in this experiment, the effort required to define the path is assumed to be seven times greater.…”
Section: Experiments Using Random Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of C drving path for one product is assumed to be "1", while the value of C drving path for the entire product line is seven times as much as an individual product. The cost of making an asset reusable is widely estimated to be 150% of the cost of building the asset for a single use [26,27]. Given the high complexity of MM-path derivation in a product line, in this experiment, the effort required to define the path is assumed to be seven times greater.…”
Section: Experiments Using Random Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%