2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-68260-8_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conducted two primary analyses based on the criteria for test positivity: Regarding the Activity > background group, 18 of the included studies employed a qualitative criterion for test positivity based on the relative activation between the lymph nodes and the surrounding tissue (Bille 2013; Chen 2010; De Wever 2007;Gunluoglu 2011;Harders 2012;Jeon 2010;Kim 2007;Kuo 2012;Lee 2007;Lee 2009a;Li 2012a;Plathow 2008;Shin 2008;Tasci 2010;Toba 2010;Yang 2008;Yang 2010;Yi 2008). The summary sensitivity and specificity estimates for this criterion for test positivity were 77.4% (95% CI 65.3 to 86.1) and 90.1% (95% CI 85.3 to 93.5), respectively.…”
Section: Figure 6 Forest Plot Of Studies With Other/mixed/unclear Crmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted two primary analyses based on the criteria for test positivity: Regarding the Activity > background group, 18 of the included studies employed a qualitative criterion for test positivity based on the relative activation between the lymph nodes and the surrounding tissue (Bille 2013; Chen 2010; De Wever 2007;Gunluoglu 2011;Harders 2012;Jeon 2010;Kim 2007;Kuo 2012;Lee 2007;Lee 2009a;Li 2012a;Plathow 2008;Shin 2008;Tasci 2010;Toba 2010;Yang 2008;Yang 2010;Yi 2008). The summary sensitivity and specificity estimates for this criterion for test positivity were 77.4% (95% CI 65.3 to 86.1) and 90.1% (95% CI 85.3 to 93.5), respectively.…”
Section: Figure 6 Forest Plot Of Studies With Other/mixed/unclear Crmentioning
confidence: 99%