2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case series of undetected intranasal impression material in patients with clefts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), [25] which uses the rank probabilities from rankograms, represents a relative ranking measure, and a larger SUCRA value had indicated better rank for a certain therapy among the various therapeutic schemes available. In this study, the inconsistency was assessed in the network meta-analysis, but the results suggested that direct comparisons were lacking, and no inconsistency could be formally detected in this model, [24,26,27] as shown in Figure 1. In addition, the common heterogeneity variance for the network (tau [τ]) was employed to assess the degree of heterogeneity in all network analyses, and the values of τ < 0.5 were considered as reasonable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), [25] which uses the rank probabilities from rankograms, represents a relative ranking measure, and a larger SUCRA value had indicated better rank for a certain therapy among the various therapeutic schemes available. In this study, the inconsistency was assessed in the network meta-analysis, but the results suggested that direct comparisons were lacking, and no inconsistency could be formally detected in this model, [24,26,27] as shown in Figure 1. In addition, the common heterogeneity variance for the network (tau [τ]) was employed to assess the degree of heterogeneity in all network analyses, and the values of τ < 0.5 were considered as reasonable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[ 7 ] Displaced intranasal impression material may remain undetected for a very long period of time. [ 8 ] Patient positioning, tray, and impression material are the important factors for safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…95 Jones ve ark. 'nın 96 yaptığı ve 2011 yılında yayınlanan bir vaka raporu ilk operasyondan 20 yıl sonra, postnazal akıntı ve halitozis şikayetiyle başvuran 2 DDY'li bireyde nazal kavitede ölçü maddesi kaldığını göstermiştir. Araştırıcılara göre küçük yarıklarda ölçü maddesi boşluğa doğru itilebilir ve kaşığı çıkarırken koparak nazal kavitede kalabilir.…”
Section: Oral Ve Nazal Halitozisunclassified