1998
DOI: 10.1136/ip.4.1.54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case series and exposure series: the role of studies without controls in providing information about the etiology of injury or disease

Abstract: Descriptions of exposure histories in persons with the same injury or illness ("case series"), and descriptions of outcomes in persons with the same exposure ("exposure series"), have the potential to contribute knowledge relevant to disease etiology in some special situations. The case series can be thought of as a primitive form of case-control study-one in which the controls are only implied. Similarly, the exposure series is a rudimentary type of cohort study. By keeping these analogies in mind, those who … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while some have argued that under certain circumstances benefit can be obtained from the careful, conservative evaluation of studies without controls (Cummings & Weiss, 1998), a controlled clinical trial is still imperative before a confident interpretation of these results can be made. This research utilized a naturalistic design where participants applied to be included in the course.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while some have argued that under certain circumstances benefit can be obtained from the careful, conservative evaluation of studies without controls (Cummings & Weiss, 1998), a controlled clinical trial is still imperative before a confident interpretation of these results can be made. This research utilized a naturalistic design where participants applied to be included in the course.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Furthermore, identified as exposure series observation (exposure = CSFK), its favorable final outcome is valid: only 8.6% with mild renal injury, none had proteinuria, hypertension, and growth-retardation. 21 One cannot ignore the effect of the intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emergency ascent then followed as the most common disabling agent, in 55% of 332 deaths where the disabling agent could be identified [119]. Factors involved in cases of DCI reported to BSAC between 1998 and 2008 are listed in table 10 (note, more than one factor may have been attributed to each case) [120]. Although diving to >30 m appeared over the period to be decreasing in prevalence as a risk factor, 27% of cases of DCI in the UK primarily involved rapid ascents, only a fifth (20%) involved dives within the accepted recreational time-depth limits and a sixth (16%) involved exceeding those limits and missing the required decompression stops.…”
Section: What Are the Inciting Events?mentioning
confidence: 99%