Abstract:Endodontic failures associated with poor quality of endodontics respond favorably to retreatment. Nevertheless, under certain clinical conditions, apicoectomy should be the preferred procedure. A retrospective survey of 200 roots that were referred for apical surgery revealed that 83% of the roots were inadequately obturated, including 8.5% with no root canal filling at all. In 49 of the roots in this group (24.5% of the referred cases) nonsurgical retreatment was judged by an endodontist as either impossible … Show more
Aim and Objectives:To evaluate bone regeneration in endodontically induced periapical lesions using Hydroxyapatite, Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP), and a combination of Hydroxyapatite and Platelet-Rich Plasma for a period of one year.Materials and Methods:Twenty systemically healthy patients of both genders between the ages 20 and 40 years were included. To qualify, the patient had to have a tooth where non-surgical root canal therapy had failed, periapical radiolucency was present, and periapical root end surgery was required. The bony defect had to be confined to the apical area, with the bone covering the entire root surface coronally, with an intact lingual cortical plate. Patients were randomly divided into four groups, with five patients each, as follows: Group I — Replacement with Hydroxyapatite, Group II — Replacement with PRP, Group III — Replacement with PRP and Hydroxyapatite, and Group IV — Control group with no substitutes. The patients were evaluated both clinically and radiographically.Results:The radiographic evaluation revealed that Group I patients showed complete bone regeneration with evidence of a trabecular pattern, at the end of one year, Group II patients showed complete bone regeneration at the end of nine months, Group III patients showed complete bone regeneration at the end of six months, and Group IV patients showed bone regeneration, which was not satisfactory even after one year.Conclusions:The PRP and Hydroxyapatite combination facilitated better and faster bone regeneration when compared to PRP alone.
Aim and Objectives:To evaluate bone regeneration in endodontically induced periapical lesions using Hydroxyapatite, Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP), and a combination of Hydroxyapatite and Platelet-Rich Plasma for a period of one year.Materials and Methods:Twenty systemically healthy patients of both genders between the ages 20 and 40 years were included. To qualify, the patient had to have a tooth where non-surgical root canal therapy had failed, periapical radiolucency was present, and periapical root end surgery was required. The bony defect had to be confined to the apical area, with the bone covering the entire root surface coronally, with an intact lingual cortical plate. Patients were randomly divided into four groups, with five patients each, as follows: Group I — Replacement with Hydroxyapatite, Group II — Replacement with PRP, Group III — Replacement with PRP and Hydroxyapatite, and Group IV — Control group with no substitutes. The patients were evaluated both clinically and radiographically.Results:The radiographic evaluation revealed that Group I patients showed complete bone regeneration with evidence of a trabecular pattern, at the end of one year, Group II patients showed complete bone regeneration at the end of nine months, Group III patients showed complete bone regeneration at the end of six months, and Group IV patients showed bone regeneration, which was not satisfactory even after one year.Conclusions:The PRP and Hydroxyapatite combination facilitated better and faster bone regeneration when compared to PRP alone.
“…[172122] In other words, the majority of apical lesions whether cysts or granuloma heal without surgery; only those few lesions that may be true cysts in histology need surgery. [5] Nonsurgical approach in cases of AP is the first treatment option, based on the current concept of treatment decision making;[23] and in case of persistent symptoms the surgical removal of the lesion is considered as the next step. [192022] The treatment outcome for this patient, confirms this statement that although the lesion responded favorably to nonsurgical treatment, the possibility for surgical intervention was kept in mind in case it did not.…”
Periapical lesion is a general term used to describe the periapical inflammatory process that occurs in response to the invasion of micro-organisms in the root canal system as well as inflamed vital pulp. This phenomenon necessitates endodontic intervention and if the necrosis has occurred prior to tooth maturation, wide patency of the apical foramen requires some treatment modalities such as apexification or apical plug. Orthodontic treatment, on the other hand, is cautiously done for previously traumatized teeth due to increased risk for necrosis of the compromised tooth. This article tends to review the successful treatment process with calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement apical plug for an immature previously traumatized incisor tooth with an extensive periapical lesion, which was under orthodontic treatment as well.
“…failure, and the root canal is coronally accessible and negotiable, surgical treatment is not considered the treatment of choice (8). The success rate for periradicular surgery is lower than that of root canal retreatment.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.