2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:ddas.0000017463.46961.94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CASE REPORT: Primary Epiploic Appendagitis: An Underappreciated Diagnosis. A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Ils ont pour la majorité d'entre eux une épaisseur de 1 à 2 cm et une longueur de 2 à 5 cm. Chez la plupart des adultes, on dénombre entre le caecum et la jonction rectosigmoïdienne de 50 à 100 franges épiploïques [6][7][8]. Chacune d'entre elles est vascularisée par 1 ou 2 petites artérioles et drainée par 1 ou 2 veinules qui passent dans un pédicule étroit vers la base de la frange.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Ils ont pour la majorité d'entre eux une épaisseur de 1 à 2 cm et une longueur de 2 à 5 cm. Chez la plupart des adultes, on dénombre entre le caecum et la jonction rectosigmoïdienne de 50 à 100 franges épiploïques [6][7][8]. Chacune d'entre elles est vascularisée par 1 ou 2 petites artérioles et drainée par 1 ou 2 veinules qui passent dans un pédicule étroit vers la base de la frange.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Physical exertion or an extreme stretching movement of the abdomen has been reported to be a predisposing factor in the development of PEA (Ghahremani et al, 1992;Jennings & Collins, 1987;Ross, 1950;Rioux & Langis, 1994). Although epiploic appendages are present along the entire length of the large intestine, published reports suggest that 57% of PEA cases affect the rectosigmoid junction and 26% of cases affect the ileocecal region (Legome et al, 1999;Sangha et al, 2004;Hiller et al, 2000). An inflamed epiploic appendage in these locations produces a sharp, focal, non-migratory abdominal pain that can easily be mistaken for diverticulitis, appendicitis or acute cholecystitis (Boulanger et al, 2002;Schnedl et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An inflamed epiploic appendage in these locations produces a sharp, focal, non-migratory abdominal pain that can easily be mistaken for diverticulitis, appendicitis or acute cholecystitis (Boulanger et al, 2002;Schnedl et al, 2011). Patients are predominantly afebrile and do not usually have gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, anorexia or changes in bowel habits (Legome et al, 2002;Sangha, 2004). Physical examination is usually notable for focal tenderness localized over the site of inflammation (Rioux & Langis, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common treatment method is the conservative approach with anti-inflammatory drugs or short-term opiates (acetaminophen/codeine) (3,4,6). Antibiotic use and hospitalization is usually not required in uncomplicated cases (7). Surgical treatment is performed in patients not responding to the conservative approach or in patients developing complications, such as intussusception, abscess, or intestinal obstruction (8).…”
Section: Journal Of Clinical and Analytical Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%