Prophylactic therapy is generally used to prevent reactivated hepatitis B after transplantation of an antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc)-positive liver. To gain insight into current practice, a questionnaire was e-mailed to 89 liver transplant physicians in the United States, Europe, and Asia/Australia and 4 hepatitis B experts. Addressees were asked if they prefer lamivudine or other nucleoside analogs and whether these drugs are used indefinitely. They were also questioned about the use of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg), the preferred duration of its administration, and whether treatment strategies differ according to the knowledge of the serologic status of the recipient. Responses were obtained from 78 physicians. All transplant physicians reported the use of nucleoside analog therapy, and 65% prefer lamivudine (58% versus 81% for US and non-US physicians, P ϭ 0.05). Sixty-one percent use HBIg (38% always, 23% sometimes). HBIg was used more frequently in the United States than other parts of the world (69% versus 46%, P ϭ 0.03). Eighty-one percent of transplant physicians use nucleoside analog therapy for an indefinite period, but the duration of HBIg treatment varies widely. Although some centers omit nucleoside analog or HBIg therapy in antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen-positive recipients, 90% will not omit these agents if the recipient is positive for anti-HBc alone. In conclusion, nucleoside analog therapy is nearly always used for anti-HBc-positive livers, and most transplant physicians treat for an indefinite period. Lamivudine continues to be preferred as first-line therapy. Many programs also use HBIg, but there is wide variation in the way this is administered. Further study is needed to determine the most cost-beneficial regimen. Liver Transpl 15: 223-232, 2009. © 2009 AASLD. Received May 27, 2008 accepted September 22, 2008. It has been known for more than a decade that antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc)-positive liver donation is associated with a risk of hepatitis B reactivation in the allograft.1,2 Prior to the development of antiviral therapy, the risk was observed to be highest (50%-75%) for recipients without past hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, lowest (0%-5%) for individuals with anti-HBc and antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), and intermediate (0%-18%) for individuals positive for anti-HBs or anti-HBc 1-5 As a result of these data, the standard of care at many centers has become providing antiviral and/or hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) prophylaxis to the recipient when a donor is anti-HBc-positive. This meant the use of HBIg before lamivudine became available in 1998. By 2001, 90% of United States liver transplant programs reported that they used lamivudine, either alone or with HBIg. 6 In chronic hepatitis B, prolonged treatment of hepatitis B with lamivudine results in a much higher rate of drug resistance in comparison with other nucleoside analogs.7 It is unknown, however, if a lower rate of resistance is clinically ...