1921
DOI: 10.1177/003591572101400921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case of Paralysis Agitans following Malaria

Abstract: Pain in stomach two hours after food, relieved by vomiting, improved since 1915 until recently. No unsteadirWss of walking and no sphincter disturbance.Present state: Visual acuity: Right, -; left, s1r on looking to right of fixation point, at that point vision almost nil. Fields: Loss of upper half and general constriction, with central scotoma. Fundi: Old atrophy. Argyll Robertson pupils. No ataxy. Deep pressure of calves very painful. Deep reflexes absent. X-ray suggests cicatrix from old ulcer or growth of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1924
1924
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stern saw no point, therefore, in speculating about the specific etiology, but was convinced that the epidemiological and pathological evidence contributed by Economo, himself and others was sufficient to establish the separateness of the two disorders, and that the relationship, if any, was quite complex and far from obligate. Influenza might act as an agent provocateur , according to Stern, but it was not specific; measles (Capaldo 1932), typhus (Nagtegaal 1927; Rabinowitsch 1928) and malaria (Wilson 1921) could also elicit EL-like symptoms. Indeed, the similarity of EL and a number of other encephalitides with no connection to influenza – Japanese encephalitis, poliomyelitis and post-vaccinal encephalitis – was indirect evidence for the frailty of the unitary EL/influenza hypothesis (Stern 1936).…”
Section: The 1920s Debate On the Link Between El And Influenzamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stern saw no point, therefore, in speculating about the specific etiology, but was convinced that the epidemiological and pathological evidence contributed by Economo, himself and others was sufficient to establish the separateness of the two disorders, and that the relationship, if any, was quite complex and far from obligate. Influenza might act as an agent provocateur , according to Stern, but it was not specific; measles (Capaldo 1932), typhus (Nagtegaal 1927; Rabinowitsch 1928) and malaria (Wilson 1921) could also elicit EL-like symptoms. Indeed, the similarity of EL and a number of other encephalitides with no connection to influenza – Japanese encephalitis, poliomyelitis and post-vaccinal encephalitis – was indirect evidence for the frailty of the unitary EL/influenza hypothesis (Stern 1936).…”
Section: The 1920s Debate On the Link Between El And Influenzamentioning
confidence: 99%