Fusarium proliferatum caused endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. Diagnosis was established by classical microbiology and molecular biology methods (PCR and DNA typing). The treatment with local amphotericin B, oral ketoconazole, and topical natamycin was successful.
CASE REPORTA 66-year-old man underwent cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation in his right eye. Four months after surgery, he complained of eye discomfort and was prescribed a topical steroid (dexamethasone) and tobramicin. Fifteen days later, his symptoms persisted, and the eye began to show severe palpebral edema. Slit lamp examination showed conjunctival hyperemia, hypopyon, capsular fibrosis, and corneal edema, and the intraocular lens had moved to the nasal site. Intraocular pressure was 28 mm Hg, and fundus examination showed vitreous haze. An aqueous humor sample was taken using a 30-gauge needle following examination of the eye. Diagnostic techniques included standard microbiological tests (culture and stains) and PCR. The aqueous humor sample was cultured on several media including Columbia agar plates supplemented with 5% sheep blood chocolate agar, MacConkey agar, and thioglycolate broth and brain heart infusion broth (all media were from Biomérieux, biomérieux Sa, Marcy L'Etoile, France) at 37°C in ambient air. The sample was also inoculated into Sabouraud dextrose agar with chloramphenicol and incubated at 30°C. Two different PCRs were carried out: the first focused on bacterial 16S rRNA gene (16) amplification, and the second focused on specific detection of the fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS)/5.8S DNA region (5). All the tests on the aqueous humor sample (stains, cultures, and PCRs) were negative. Next, a vitreous sample was taken, and microbiological and molecular tests were repeated. Direct smear of the vitreous sample showed septate hyphae of a filamentous fungus with neutrophils ( Fig. 1). PCR with specific fungal primers was positive, and PCR with bacterial primers was negative. This preliminary result was obtained 6 h after the sample was taken. Antifungal treatment was given as soon as the fungal hyphae were seen in the vitreous sample by direct smear.Intravitreal amphotericin B (5 g/0.1 ml) and oral fluconazole (200 mg/day) were administered the same day the sample was taken.Amplified DNA from fungal PCR was submitted for sequence analysis (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) and compared to DNA sequences in the BLAST alignment program of the GenBank database (National Institutes of Health) and the EMBL fungal DNA database using Fasta3 sequence similarity searches, which allowed the species identification 48 h after the sample was obtained. DNA database comparison of the sequence showed 100% identity with Fusarium proliferatum (NRRL 31071; USDA Agricultural Research Service Collection, Peoria, Ill.), 99.8% identity with Fusarium fujikuroi, and 99.8 to 99.6% identity with Fusarium annulatum, all of which belong to the Gibberella fujikuroi complex (10, 26).When the molecular identification show...