1992
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.11.1.151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case Management as a Strategy for Systems Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Case managers (CMs) primarily serve individuals with serious and persistent mental illness, individuals who have frequently used acute inpatient services, and individuals who have extended stays in State inpatient psychiatric facilities, t In New York State, the objectives of case management services are (1) to employ a client-centered focus to improve individual outcomes and recovery, (2) to engage leadership in the processes of decision making within the mental health service delivery system, and (3) to identify systemic barriers to effective interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case managers (CMs) primarily serve individuals with serious and persistent mental illness, individuals who have frequently used acute inpatient services, and individuals who have extended stays in State inpatient psychiatric facilities, t In New York State, the objectives of case management services are (1) to employ a client-centered focus to improve individual outcomes and recovery, (2) to engage leadership in the processes of decision making within the mental health service delivery system, and (3) to identify systemic barriers to effective interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…model (Stein & Test, 1980); Washington DC's Community Connection program (Harris & Bergman, 1988); Philadelphia's Intensive Case Management program (Philadelphia Three Year Plan, 1986); Dincin's Thresholds model (Witheridge & Dincin, 1985), and the Kansas Developmental Acquisition model (Rapp & Chamberlain, 1985). The philosophy and value system underlying the ICM model combines principles of advocacy and empowerment with those of psychiatric rehabilitation (Anthony, Cohen, Farkas & Cohen, 1988;Rose & Black, 1985;Surles, Blanch, Shern & Donahue, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, we noted that both experimental and control participants used emergency and inpatient services at approximately equivalent rates, which we may not have expected because programs like Choices are often associated with decreased inpatient and emergency use. 17 We found that, even with strong advocacy, individuals in the Choices program preferred to receive most services solely through Choices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The Choices program was similar in structure to an intensive case management program, 17,18 with a client-to-staff ratio of about 13:1. Choices was staffed by 6 rehabilitation specialists who received extensive training and ongoing supervision from Boston University personnel and respite staff who oversaw the respite housing and operated the center on weekends and holidays.…”
Section: Experimental and Standard Treatment Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%