Abstract:This case history describes the foundation design and construction for the New Mississippi River Bridge, presently under construction in St. Louis, Missouri. The 1,500 ft (457.2 m) main span of the cable-stayed bridge is supported by two delta tower pylons in the river, with anchor piers on each bank. The final foundation design was completed as a part of an Alternate Technical Concept (ATC) proposal by the winning construction team, and utilized drilled shafts up to 11.5-ft (3.5-m) diameter that were socketed… Show more
“…The C value, as determined using equation (1), was 0?43 in the competent moderately strong to strong limestone. This C value is consistent with the C values that were reported in Brown (2009) and Axtell and Brown (2011) for moderately strong to strong limestone. In weathered moderately strong to strong limestone, the C value ranged from 0?11 to 0?17.…”
Section: Small Movementssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, for Piers 11 and 12, there was a layer of lower strength rock that was approximately 1?5 m thick with an f ' r value equal to 35 MPa at a depth of 6?1 m. Four bidirectional load cells (BLCs), each with a total capacity of 213?5 MN, were used to confirm the side and end bearing resistance values and the quality of the construction methods. The average unit end bearing and unit side resistance in the rock socket were 22 and 2?1 MPa respectively (Axtell and Brown, 2011). These values were not the ultimate strength values because very small movements were measured (displacement values less than 0?4 cm in either direction corresponding to 0?1% of the diameter of the shafts).…”
Section: Literature Review Case Historiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Axtell and Brown (2011), four 3?5 m diameter DSFs were utilized in the design and construction of the New Mississippi River Bridge located north of St. Louis, Missouri. The test shaft for these foundations was socketed 7?1 m into moderately strong limestone (f ' r .69 MPa with an average f ' r value of approximately 166 MPa).…”
Section: Literature Review Case Historiesmentioning
Three drilled shaft foundations (DSFs) were constructed in moderately strong to strong limestone at the Siloam Springs Arkansas Test Site (SSATS). The embedment lengths within the limestone were 3?0, 1?5 and 2?1 m for the DSFs with diameters of 1?2, 1?8 and 1?2 m, respectively. The DSFs were instrumented to facilitate cross-hole sonic logging testing and full scale load testing using bidirectional load cells (BLCs). Lessons learned from construction included the: (1) proper concrete pouring techniques; (2) ability to retrofit improperly installed telltale instrumentation; and (3) influence of rock socket length within moderately strong to strong limestone. Recommended design, construction and testing techniques in moderately strong to strong limestone are presented. Based on the full scale testing, t-z model recommendations for weathered limestone and moderately strong to strong limestone are presented and discussed. Comparisons between measured unit side resistance and current design recommendations are also considered.
“…The C value, as determined using equation (1), was 0?43 in the competent moderately strong to strong limestone. This C value is consistent with the C values that were reported in Brown (2009) and Axtell and Brown (2011) for moderately strong to strong limestone. In weathered moderately strong to strong limestone, the C value ranged from 0?11 to 0?17.…”
Section: Small Movementssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, for Piers 11 and 12, there was a layer of lower strength rock that was approximately 1?5 m thick with an f ' r value equal to 35 MPa at a depth of 6?1 m. Four bidirectional load cells (BLCs), each with a total capacity of 213?5 MN, were used to confirm the side and end bearing resistance values and the quality of the construction methods. The average unit end bearing and unit side resistance in the rock socket were 22 and 2?1 MPa respectively (Axtell and Brown, 2011). These values were not the ultimate strength values because very small movements were measured (displacement values less than 0?4 cm in either direction corresponding to 0?1% of the diameter of the shafts).…”
Section: Literature Review Case Historiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Axtell and Brown (2011), four 3?5 m diameter DSFs were utilized in the design and construction of the New Mississippi River Bridge located north of St. Louis, Missouri. The test shaft for these foundations was socketed 7?1 m into moderately strong limestone (f ' r .69 MPa with an average f ' r value of approximately 166 MPa).…”
Section: Literature Review Case Historiesmentioning
Three drilled shaft foundations (DSFs) were constructed in moderately strong to strong limestone at the Siloam Springs Arkansas Test Site (SSATS). The embedment lengths within the limestone were 3?0, 1?5 and 2?1 m for the DSFs with diameters of 1?2, 1?8 and 1?2 m, respectively. The DSFs were instrumented to facilitate cross-hole sonic logging testing and full scale load testing using bidirectional load cells (BLCs). Lessons learned from construction included the: (1) proper concrete pouring techniques; (2) ability to retrofit improperly installed telltale instrumentation; and (3) influence of rock socket length within moderately strong to strong limestone. Recommended design, construction and testing techniques in moderately strong to strong limestone are presented. Based on the full scale testing, t-z model recommendations for weathered limestone and moderately strong to strong limestone are presented and discussed. Comparisons between measured unit side resistance and current design recommendations are also considered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.