The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.1179/dfi.2011.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case History: Foundations for the New Mississippi River Bridge, St. Louis

Abstract: This case history describes the foundation design and construction for the New Mississippi River Bridge, presently under construction in St. Louis, Missouri. The 1,500 ft (457.2 m) main span of the cable-stayed bridge is supported by two delta tower pylons in the river, with anchor piers on each bank. The final foundation design was completed as a part of an Alternate Technical Concept (ATC) proposal by the winning construction team, and utilized drilled shafts up to 11.5-ft (3.5-m) diameter that were socketed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The C value, as determined using equation (1), was 0?43 in the competent moderately strong to strong limestone. This C value is consistent with the C values that were reported in Brown (2009) and Axtell and Brown (2011) for moderately strong to strong limestone. In weathered moderately strong to strong limestone, the C value ranged from 0?11 to 0?17.…”
Section: Small Movementssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The C value, as determined using equation (1), was 0?43 in the competent moderately strong to strong limestone. This C value is consistent with the C values that were reported in Brown (2009) and Axtell and Brown (2011) for moderately strong to strong limestone. In weathered moderately strong to strong limestone, the C value ranged from 0?11 to 0?17.…”
Section: Small Movementssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, for Piers 11 and 12, there was a layer of lower strength rock that was approximately 1?5 m thick with an f ' r value equal to 35 MPa at a depth of 6?1 m. Four bidirectional load cells (BLCs), each with a total capacity of 213?5 MN, were used to confirm the side and end bearing resistance values and the quality of the construction methods. The average unit end bearing and unit side resistance in the rock socket were 22 and 2?1 MPa respectively (Axtell and Brown, 2011). These values were not the ultimate strength values because very small movements were measured (displacement values less than 0?4 cm in either direction corresponding to 0?1% of the diameter of the shafts).…”
Section: Literature Review Case Historiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation