Case-controlled field study of the ICD-11 clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for Bodily Distress Disorders

Keeley, Jared W.; Reed, Geoffrey M.; Rebello, Tahilia J.; Brechbiel, Julia; Garcia-Pacheco, José A; Adebayo, Kazeem Olaide; Esan, Oluyomi; Majekodunmi, Oluyinka; Ojagbemi, Akin; Onofa, Lucky; Robles, Rebeca; Matsumoto, Chihiro; Medina-Mora, María Elena; Kogan, Cary S.; Kulygina, Maya; Gäebel, Wolfgang; Zhao, Min; Roberts, Michael C.; Sharan, Pratap; Ayuso-Mateos, José Luís; Khoury, Brigitte; Stein, Dan J.; Lovell, Anne M.; Pike, Kathleen M.; Creed, Francis; Gureje, Oye

doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.04.086

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The new ICD-11 category of bodily distress disorder appears to have good predictive validity, outperforming the diagnosis of somatic symptom disorder in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in being able to differentiate disordered from nondisordered persons (Schumacher et al, 2017). An ICD-11 field study also indicated that mental health professionals were able to use the ICD-11 category of bodily distress disorder more accurately and rated it as having greater clinical utility than ICD-10 somatoform disorders (Keeley et al, 2023).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Bodily distress disorder.

Gureje,

Ojagbemi

2024

A Psychological Approach to Diagnosis: Using the ICD-11 as a Framework.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We are all aware at times of bodily or somatic sensations or symptoms, including bodily discomfort or mildly painful sensations. Unless these are associated with an ongoing physical illness, these sensations are typically transient and fairly easily ignored or forgotten. When such bodily concerns become a source of persistent worry or bother (in excess of what can be attributed to a medical condition that may be causing or contributing to the symptoms), they can become a source of suffering and disability. The diagnosis of bodily distress disorder in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11; World Health Organization [WHO], 2023) is intended to differentiate between persons with distressing bodily symptoms to which excessive attention is directed and who may benefit from mental health treatment from those with somatic experiences that are less disabling and of less personal significance (Gureje & Reed, 2016). In bodily distress disorder, somatic symptoms are thought to represent an expression of emotional and cognitive disturbances, for which a range of therapeutic responses may be indicated.The immediate precursors of bodily distress disorder are several diagnostic categories in the ICD-10 grouping of somatoform disorders. In fact, bodily distress disorder replaces nearly the entire ICD-10 grouping of somatoform disorders (except for hypochondriacal disorder, which has been moved to the ICD-11 grouping of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders). The main

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Bodily distress disorder.

Gureje,

Ojagbemi

2024

A Psychological Approach to Diagnosis: Using the ICD-11 as a Framework.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Relationship Between Childhood Traumatic Experiences and Bodily Distress Syndrome: The Mediating Role of Somatoform Dissociation

Doustmohammadi,

Tavoli,

Tanhaye Reshvanloo

et al. 2024

The Journal of Genetic Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Surviving the shift: College student satisfaction with emergency online learning during COVID-19 pandemic

Zhai,

Lei,

Zhao

et al. 2023

World J Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic disrupted education systems by forcing systems to shift to emergency online leaning. Online learning satisfaction affects academic achievement. Many factors affect online learning satisfaction. However there is little study focused on personal characteristics, mental status, and coping style when college students participated in emergency online courses. AIM To assess factors related to satisfaction with emergency online learning among college students in Hebei province during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1600 college students. The collected information included demographics, psychological aspects of emergent public health events, and coping style. Single factor, correlation, and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify factors that affected online learning satisfaction. RESULTS Descriptive findings indicated that 62.9% (994/1580) of students were satisfied with online learning. Factors that had significant positive effects on online learning satisfaction were online learning at scheduled times, strong exercise intensity, good health, regular schedule, focusing on the epidemic less than one hour a day, and maintaining emotional stability. Positive coping styles were protective factors of online learning satisfaction. Risk factors for poor satisfaction were depression, neurasthenia, and negative coping style. CONCLUSION College students with different personal characteristics, mental status, and coping style exhibited different degrees of online learning satisfaction. Our findings provide reference for educators, psychologists, and school administrators to conduct health education intervention of college students during emergency online learning.

show abstract

Case-controlled field study of the ICD-11 clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for Bodily Distress Disorders

Cited by 3 publications

References 31 publications

Bodily distress disorder.

Bodily distress disorder.

The Relationship Between Childhood Traumatic Experiences and Bodily Distress Syndrome: The Mediating Role of Somatoform Dissociation

Surviving the shift: College student satisfaction with emergency online learning during COVID-19 pandemic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About