2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2013.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case–control study on perfluorinated alkyl acids (PFAAs) and the risk of prostate cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No convincing evidence was found for increased breast cancer risk in relation with serum PFAS levels [317]. Higher PFAA serum concentrations were generally not associated with increased risk of prostate cancer, except for those with hereditary prostate cancer [318]. A critical review of the epidemiologic evidence for cancer risk emphasizes that most relative risk estimates vary only from 0.5 to 2.0 (with large confidence intervals); are inconsistent and sometimes counterbalanced by negative associations; indicate no monotonic exposure…”
Section: General Populationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…No convincing evidence was found for increased breast cancer risk in relation with serum PFAS levels [317]. Higher PFAA serum concentrations were generally not associated with increased risk of prostate cancer, except for those with hereditary prostate cancer [318]. A critical review of the epidemiologic evidence for cancer risk emphasizes that most relative risk estimates vary only from 0.5 to 2.0 (with large confidence intervals); are inconsistent and sometimes counterbalanced by negative associations; indicate no monotonic exposure…”
Section: General Populationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Serum concentrations of various PFAS were measured in the blood of patients with hereditary prostate cancer in Sweden 80 . PFDA, but not PFOA or PFNA, was found to have a positive correlation between concentration and prostate cancer incidence.…”
Section: Humansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human studies of people exposed to PFOA and PFOS occupationally, residentially, and at background levels have found associations with changes in lipid and cholesterol concentrations (Frisbee et al, 2010; Nelson et al, 2010; Fletcher et al, 2011; Steenland et al, 2015), increased uric acid levels (Costa et al, 2009; Steenland et al, 2010; Shankar et al, 2011; Geiger et al, 2013; Gleason et al, 2015), changes in the concentrations of thyroid and sex hormones (Olsen and Zobel, 2007; Knox et al, 2011; Jain, 2013; Wen et al, 2013; Winquist and Steenland, 2014), changes in liver enzymes (Olsen et al, 2000; Sakr et al, 2007; Lin et al, 2010; Gallo et al, 2012; Gleason et al, 2015), immune effects (Grandjean et al, 2012; Granum et al, 2013; Dalsager et al, 2016), reduced birth weight (Apelberg et al, 2007; Fei et al, 2007; Chen et al, 2012; Darrow et al, 2013), reproductive effects (Joensen et al, 2013; Kristensen et al, 2013; Crawford et al, 2017), and some cancers (Alexander and Olsen, 2007; Barry et al, 2013; Bonefeld-Jorgensen et al, 2014; Hardell et al, 2014; Steenland et al, 2015). Other studies have demonstrated no association between PFAS exposure and these health effects (Inoue et al, 2004; Alexander and Olsen, 2007; Fisher et al, 2013; Chang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%