1997
DOI: 10.5715/jnlp.4.2_111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case Contribution in Example-Based Verb Sense Disambiguation

Abstract: Word sense disambiguation has recently been utilized in corpus-based approaches, reflecting the growth in the number of machine readable texts.One category of approaches disambiguates an input verb sense based on the similarity between its governing case fillers and those in given examples.In this paper,we introduce the degree of case contribution to verb sense disambiguation into this existing method. In this,greater diversity of semantic range of case filler examples will lead to that case contributing to ve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It means that data samples arrive in a stream and the learner has to decide, on a sample per sample basis, if it wants the current sample to be labeled [29] [30] [31]. This is definitely the problem we face in gesture command learning: to decide after each gesture command if it will be interesting to learn from this gesture, and then ask the user for its true label.…”
Section: Active Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It means that data samples arrive in a stream and the learner has to decide, on a sample per sample basis, if it wants the current sample to be labeled [29] [30] [31]. This is definitely the problem we face in gesture command learning: to decide after each gesture command if it will be interesting to learn from this gesture, and then ask the user for its true label.…”
Section: Active Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, there are abundant stream-based active learning methods. The committee-based sampling method proposed in [15] constructs a 'committee' of classifiers and queries the items which are most disagreed upon by the committee members; In [62], the active learner queries the items that are most difficult to classify in order to revise the decision boundary; [22] proposes to query items which correctly disambiguate as much unseen data as possible. Although there are many active learning methods, most of them assume that all the classes to be learned are known before learning starts, and the goal is to find the query data that are "best" for improving the accuracy of the classifiers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one of the few works directly applied to WSD, Fujii, Inui, Tokunaga, and Tanaka (1998) used selective sampling for the acquisition of examples for the disambiguation of verb senses, in an iterative process with human taggers. The informative examples were chosen following two criteria: maximum number of neighbors in unsupervised data, and minimum similarity with the supervised example set.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%