CASE: Commonsense-Augmented Score with an Expanded Answer Space

Abstract

LLMs have demonstrated impressive zero-shot performance on NLP tasks thanks to the knowledge they acquired in their training. In multiplechoice QA tasks, the LM probabilities are used as an imperfect measure of the plausibility of each answer choice. One of the major limitations of the basic score is that it treats all words as equally important. We propose CASE, a Commonsense-Augmented Score with an Expanded Answer Space. CASE addresses this limitation by assigning importance weights for individual words based on their semantic relations to other words in the input. The dynamic weighting approach outperforms basic LM scores, not only because it reduces noise from unimportant words, but also because it informs the model of implicit commonsense knowledge that may be useful for answering the question. We then also follow prior work in expanding the answer space by generating lexically-divergent answers that are conceptually-similar to the choices. When combined with answer space expansion, our method outperforms strong baselines on 5 commonsense benchmarks. We further show these two approaches are complementary and may be especially beneficial when using smaller LMs. The woman hired a lawyer because A. she decided to sue her employer. B. she decided to run for office. C. she wanted to sue her former employer. The woman hired a lawyer because ___ A. she decided to sue her employer. B. she decided to run for office. C. she wanted to sue her former employer. LM score = 2.53 CASE score = 2.70 LM score = 2.35 CASE score = 2.76 LM score = 1.80 CASE score = 1.89