1995
DOI: 10.1207/s15324834basp1703_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case Closed? On the John F. Kennedy Assassination: Biased Assimilation of Evidence and Attitude Polarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
105
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
105
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…First, conspiracy theories have surrounded the death of Princess Diana and the Kennedy assassination for some time. In fact, conspiracies about the death of President Kennedy remain among the most widely held in American society (McCauley & Jacques, 1979;McHoskey, 1995). A second considerable limitation is the blending of both historical and conspiratorial information in both studies.…”
Section: Fictional Media and Conspiracy Beliefsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, conspiracy theories have surrounded the death of Princess Diana and the Kennedy assassination for some time. In fact, conspiracies about the death of President Kennedy remain among the most widely held in American society (McCauley & Jacques, 1979;McHoskey, 1995). A second considerable limitation is the blending of both historical and conspiratorial information in both studies.…”
Section: Fictional Media and Conspiracy Beliefsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hypothesis confirmation; Snyder, 1984), and also motivational accounts such as cognitive dissonance theory (Festinger, 1957). Such biased assimilation of information typically leads to attitude polarization, where a prior belief is reinforced (McHoskey, 1995). 10 This bias also operates at the group level where it can be reinforced by social pressures.…”
Section: Some Reasons For the Breakdown In Corporate Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, researchers interested in cognitive factors have explored issues such as people's (lack of) awareness of their own susceptibility to conspiracy theories (Douglas and Sutton, 2008), whether or not conspiracy theorists exhibit a bias towards seeking big causes to explain big effects, or whether they are, for example susceptible to 'biased assimilation' -the tendency to uncritically accept evidence supporting a pre-existing view and reject disconfirming information (e.g. McCauley and Jacques, 1979, Butler et al, 1995, McHoskey, 1995, Leman and Cinnirella, 2007, Leman, 2007.…”
Section: The Emerging 'Social Psychology Of Conspiracy Theories'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies looking at social psychological factors have, on the other hand, produced largely inconsistent findings allowing only tentative conclusions. For example, some studies have found a positive correlation between conspiracy beliefs and authoritarianism (Abalakina-Paap et al, 1999, Grzesiak-Feldman andIrzycka, 2009); others found no correlation (McHoskey, 1995), while one recent study even suggested that people who are authoritarian have a greater tendency to be swayed by non-6 conspiratorial explanations . Similarly, while numerous studies have found a link between minority status and belief in conspiracy theories, the extent to which this relationship is mediated by socio-economic factors remains to be determined.…”
Section: The Emerging 'Social Psychology Of Conspiracy Theories'mentioning
confidence: 99%