Case 43402

Cabot, Richard C.; Castleman, Benjamin; Kibbee, Betty U.

doi:10.1056/nejm195710032571410

Cited by 14 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Further papers were identified by cross-referencing from the reference lists of relevant articles. A total of 135 patients were identified, presenting with a total of 155 GCD [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On upright abdominal X-rays or lateral views a fluid level could be demonstrated in 15 (14%) cases. This percentage would probably be higher, because in most cases, no upright X-ray is performed [4, 5, 9, 13, 15, 18, 28, 32, 36, 39, 40, 50, 69, 75, 80]. A GCD can also be found on a plain X-thorax [68], but a normal X-thorax, does not exclude the presence of a GCD [36].…”

Section: Diagnostic Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Giant Colonic Diverticula

Steenvoorde

Vogelaar²,

Oskam³

et al. 2004

Dig Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: A rare complication of diverticulosis of the colon is giant colonic diverticula (GCD). The condition was first described in English literature in 1953 [1, 2]. Methods: A Medline search was undertaken for English, French and German language articles on ’giant colonic diverticula’. Results: A total of 135 patients were identified, presenting with a total of 155 GCD [1–98]. With a complication rate of 28% and an operative mortality of 5%, GCD seems to have a high clinical significance. Radiological examination of choice seems to be plain abdominal X-ray and CT examination, barium enema carries the risk of perforation of the diverticulum, and should not be performed. Conclusions: There are different therapeutic options, in our opinion diverticulectomy alone is not the treatment of choice. Because of the possibility of recurrence and oncological reasons, colectomy seems to be the best treatment. The creation of a protecting colostomy depends on other operative findings.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Diagnostic Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Giant Colonic Diverticula

Steenvoorde

Vogelaar²,

Oskam³

et al. 2004

Dig Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Giant diverticulum of sigmoid colon

Moore

Gold

1964

Journal of British Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Solitary giant diverticulum of the sigmoid colon

Piper

Thornley

1968

Journal of British Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SOLITARY giant diverticulum of the sigmoid colon is a rare disease of which there are only 8 other published cases, none of which presented initially as an abdominal emergency.This report concerns a further case with an acute presentation requiring emergency treatment. CASE REPORTA 72-year-old female patient presented in May, 1967, with a z-day history of intermittent, colicky, central abdominal pain of sudden onset, which had become more severe on the day of admission, and was associated with the the erect position (Fig. 2) revealed that this shadow contained a definite fluid level. There was no radiological evidence of intestinal obstruction.Leucocyte count was I 1,900 per c . m . ; haemoglobin 11.8 g. per IOO ml.; blood-urea and electrolytes were within normal limits. Urine contained a few red cells and epithelial cells and was sterile.A laparotomy was performed 6 hours after admission through a right paramedian incision. The only abnormal finding was a thick-walled cystic swelling 20 cm. in diameter arising from the antimesenteric border of the apex of the sigmoid colon (Figs. 3, 4), which contained a small amount of faecal fluid. There was a communication between the lumen of the swelling and that of the sigmoid onset of fever. There was no history of vomiting, no change in bowel habit, no recent weight-loss, but she had had long-standing frequency of micturition and nocturia. There was no relevant past medical history. On examination she was flushed and moderately dehydrated but otherwise looked well. Temperature was 1 0 2~ F., pulse-rate IOO per minute, and blood-pressure 130/9o mm. Hg. Her tongue was dry and coated.On abdominal examination there was central distension. On palpation there was a central, regular, spherical, tender, immobile mass approximately 20 cm. in diameter. This was associated with generalized tenderness, guarding and rebound tenderness, and an absence of bowel-sounds. Percussion note over the mass was tympanitic. Rectal examination was normal. Plain radiography of the abdomen in the supine position revealed a large, round, gas-filled shadow 20 cm. in diameter (Fig. I)

show abstract

Case 43402

Cited by 14 publications

References 1 publication

Giant Colonic Diverticula

Giant Colonic Diverticula

Giant diverticulum of sigmoid colon

Solitary giant diverticulum of the sigmoid colon

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About