2015
DOI: 10.1002/2015jb011920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cascadia subducting plate fluids channelled to fore‐arc mantle corner: ETS and silica deposition

Abstract: In this study we first summarize the constraints that on the Cascadia subduction thrust, there is a 70 km gap downdip between the megathrust seismogenic zone and the Episodic Tremor and Slip (ETS) that lies further landward; there is not a continuous transition from unstable to conditionally stable sliding. Seismic rupture occurs mainly offshore for this hot subduction zone. ETS lies onshore. We then suggest what does control the downdip position of ETS. We conclude that fluids from dehydration of the downgoin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
119
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
7
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This flux of fluids is inferred from low Vp/Vs values found above the mantle wedge corner within the overlying crust, which may be explained by the precipitation of silica into quartz veins. This model is also consistent with the bulk of tremor activity occurring near the mantle wedge corner in most subduction zones studied here (i.e., Cascadia, southwest Japan, Costa Rica and Alaska), producing a gap in seismogenic behaviour of the megathrust as opposed to a smooth transition from unstable to stable sliding (Hyndman et al, 2015). Alternatively, serpentinites (in particular antigorites) have much lower viscosity than that of major mantle-…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This flux of fluids is inferred from low Vp/Vs values found above the mantle wedge corner within the overlying crust, which may be explained by the precipitation of silica into quartz veins. This model is also consistent with the bulk of tremor activity occurring near the mantle wedge corner in most subduction zones studied here (i.e., Cascadia, southwest Japan, Costa Rica and Alaska), producing a gap in seismogenic behaviour of the megathrust as opposed to a smooth transition from unstable to stable sliding (Hyndman et al, 2015). Alternatively, serpentinites (in particular antigorites) have much lower viscosity than that of major mantle-…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…updip edge of the main ETS zone also appears to be located approximately 70 km downdip of the seismogenic zone and around the mantle wedge corner (Hyndman et al, 2015), which suggests that fluids rising above the forearc mantle corner and along the plate interface may be responsible for ETS.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations