2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.09.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cascaded lattice Boltzmann method based on central moments for axisymmetric thermal flows including swirling effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The construction of the collision step in the LB formulations using central moments based on the peculiar velocity [29,30] naturally maintains the Galilean invariance of the moments independently supported by the lattice and its advantages have been demonstrated for a variety of fluid dynamical problems (see e.g., [31][32][33][34][35][36]). Based on these considerations, we proposed a 2D central moment rectangular LB scheme recently and demonstrated its superior numerical features for simulating flows at higher Reynolds numbers using relatively small grid aspect ratio when compared to the other existing LB methods based on the rectangular lattice [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construction of the collision step in the LB formulations using central moments based on the peculiar velocity [29,30] naturally maintains the Galilean invariance of the moments independently supported by the lattice and its advantages have been demonstrated for a variety of fluid dynamical problems (see e.g., [31][32][33][34][35][36]). Based on these considerations, we proposed a 2D central moment rectangular LB scheme recently and demonstrated its superior numerical features for simulating flows at higher Reynolds numbers using relatively small grid aspect ratio when compared to the other existing LB methods based on the rectangular lattice [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the LBE for computing fluid flow, the symmetry of their moment equilibria to respect the isotropy of the viscous stress tensor limits the dependence of the corresponding non-equilibrium second order moments to only on the symmetric part of the velocity gradient tensor (i.e., the strain rate tensor). However, the construction of the LBE for computing the transport of a passive scalar represented by the CDE does not need to satisfy these restrictive constraints, and the additional degrees of freedom available for the higher order moments can be suitably exploited [57]. Indeed, since the diffusion term of the CDE need only to satisfy a lower degree of isotropy than that of the viscous term of the NSE, the third order moment equilibria for solving the former case can be specifically designed to locally represent the skew-symmetric part of the velocity gradient tensor via the respective off-diagonal non-equilibrium secondorder moment (based on an equation analogous to the sixth equation in the above moment system withκ eq x m y n replaced byη eq x m y n andm…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We prescribe the central moment equilibria based on those of the local Maxwellian, by replacing the density with the scalar field φ (see e.g., [54,55,56]). Usually, the third order central moment equilibria then becomeη eq xxy =η eq xyy = 0 and the corresponding raw moment equilibria areη eq xxy = c 2 sφ φu y + φu 2 x u y and η eq xyy = c 2 sφ φu x + φu x u 2 y [54,55,56]. On the other hand, to enable local computation of the vorticity field, our derivation in Secs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the aforementioned studies many numerical models that use the axisymmetric form of Navier-Stokes equations have been developed, for both compressible (Gokhale and Suresh, 1997; Clain et al , 2010; Musa et al , 2016) and incompressible (Leloudas et al , 2018, 2020; Saiac, 1990; Morsi et al , 1995; Durkish, 2006; Moshkin et al , 2010; Dağtekin and Ünsal, 2011; Lee and Lee, 2011; Semião and Carvalho, 1997) flows, featuring various discretization methods, flux evaluation schemes and turbulence models. Moreover, axisymmetric flow modelling has lately become a highly attractive topic in the context of mesoscopic approaches as well, such as the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) (Zhang et al , 2019b; Lee et al , 2005; Huang et al , 2007; Liu et al , 2016; Li et al , 2018; Chen et al , 2019; Hajabdollahi et al , 2019; Liu et al , 2019). However, to the authors’ best knowledge, the implementation of an axisymmetric Navier-Stokes solver for swirling flows using the artificial compressibility method (ACM) is not available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%