“…Multiple studies have found that different biogeographic templates, encompassing those both qualitative and quantitative perspectives, were mostly congruent with each other (Bloomfield, Knerr, & Encinas-Viso, 2018; González-Orozco, Laffan, Knerr, & Miller, 2013; González-Orozco, Thornhill, Knerr, Laffan, & Miller, 2014). Yet, even when applying similar biogeographic approaches to partition Australia’s landscape, phyto- and zoo-geographers disagreed on the boundaries of some areas of Australia, such as the arid region (Ebach & Murphy, 2020). In our algorithmic, data-driven model, the partition of arid Australia is greater than in any of the bioregionalization scenarios of Bloomfield et al (2018).…”