2006
DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.115.2.210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carving nature at its joints: Paul Meehl's development of taxometrics.

Abstract: This article presents a brief summary of Paul Meehl's development of taxometrics. Of special concern is the question, Why did Paul Meehl develop taxometrics? It is shown that taxometrics played an integral role in Meehl's broader research program on the genetics of schizotaxia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides documenting the frequency of minimization, our second goal was to determine whether the MD construct measured by the CTQ is best represented as a taxon (i.e., different types of minimization) or as a dimension (i.e., degrees of minimization). To do so, we relied on taxometric analyses [ 52 56 ], procedures that determine if relations among observed data are better accounted for by the presence of dimensional or categorical latent structure. We analyzed data using three separate taxometric procedures (mean above minus below a cut, MAMBAC; maximum eigenvalue, MAXEIG; and latent mode factor, L-Mode) with Ruscio’s (2012) taxometric program for R [ 57 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides documenting the frequency of minimization, our second goal was to determine whether the MD construct measured by the CTQ is best represented as a taxon (i.e., different types of minimization) or as a dimension (i.e., degrees of minimization). To do so, we relied on taxometric analyses [ 52 56 ], procedures that determine if relations among observed data are better accounted for by the presence of dimensional or categorical latent structure. We analyzed data using three separate taxometric procedures (mean above minus below a cut, MAMBAC; maximum eigenvalue, MAXEIG; and latent mode factor, L-Mode) with Ruscio’s (2012) taxometric program for R [ 57 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meehl (2006) believed that questions of taxonicity could be answered with applied mathematics. He and his colleagues (Meehl & Yonce, 1994; Waller & Meehl, 1998) developed a family of taxometric procedures (sometimes referred to as coherent cut kinetics [Waller, 2006]) designed to, as Plato put it, “carve nature at its joints” (Meehl, 1995, p. 268; i.e., determine the underlying characteristics of latent variables). General introductions to taxometric theory can be found elsewhere (see Schmidt, Kotov, & Joiner, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, as Paul Meehl observed, the very phenotypic heterogeneity of schizophrenia and the fact that the symptoms of schizophrenia are more highly intercorrelated in mixed than in pure clinical population samples are indicative of underlying categories and inconsistent with a continuous model. 14 It may even be that psychotic symptoms are epiphenomenal to the true nature of psychosis as Bleuler 15 argued and could be considered the case when psychotic symptoms complicate Alzheimer's disease. Crucially, the research to evaluate whether categories, subtypes, continua or hybrid models of psychosis best account for the distribution of symptoms in general or patient populations has simply not been done.…”
Section: The Putative Value Of a Continuous Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%