2002
DOI: 10.17953/aicr.26.2.2jqk2x54353n6533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cartographic Review of Indian Land Tenure and Territoriality: A Schematic Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, regarding the "amount of tillable land on each reservation and its population; the numbers clearly show that on most reservations, the amount of land required for allotment under the Dawes Act far exceeded that of tillable land" (Schwartz, 2000). While scholars are still working to understand the full-scale impact that allotment had and still has on tribal lands, leading scholars of allotment seem to all agree that allotment was a ploy to steal Native Lands (Carlson, 1981;Dippie, 1982;Hoxie, 2001;Prucha, 1984;Sutton, 2002;and so on). What we would like to bring to the reader's attention is that much of the data born from the implications of allotment are obscured by the very entity that is tasked with the empowerment of Natives in the United States, the BIA (Cobell v. Salazar, 1996;Meriam Report, 1928).…”
Section: Reclaiming and Asserting Data Futuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, regarding the "amount of tillable land on each reservation and its population; the numbers clearly show that on most reservations, the amount of land required for allotment under the Dawes Act far exceeded that of tillable land" (Schwartz, 2000). While scholars are still working to understand the full-scale impact that allotment had and still has on tribal lands, leading scholars of allotment seem to all agree that allotment was a ploy to steal Native Lands (Carlson, 1981;Dippie, 1982;Hoxie, 2001;Prucha, 1984;Sutton, 2002;and so on). What we would like to bring to the reader's attention is that much of the data born from the implications of allotment are obscured by the very entity that is tasked with the empowerment of Natives in the United States, the BIA (Cobell v. Salazar, 1996;Meriam Report, 1928).…”
Section: Reclaiming and Asserting Data Futuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imre Sutton, the late professor emeritus of Geography at California State University, was one of the first academics to make a national call for more work to examine the vastness and irregularity of the cartographic record for Indian lands. While there exist many maps of Indian lands, Sutton questioned the veracity of land ownership maps as it is "hard to ascertain how accurate field maps at BIA or tribal offices are today, and the published record gets out of date very quickly" [16]. If studies of allotment and the consequences of this failed policy are to be seriously examined, there exists a need for a method to be able to generate, synthesize, and analyze allotment information.…”
Section: Research Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, in some reservations non-natives bought land that became a separate enclave to which reservation's laws are not applicable. This provokes significant administrative, political, legal and ethnic disturbances within specific reservations (Sutton, 2002). Thus, it is possible to rethink reservations and discuss their issues, to a limited extent, as the ones in divided cities.…”
Section: Instead Of a Conclusion: The Future Of Divided Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%