Abstract:Intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACI) are commonly used interventions for pain relief in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Biomarkers may be helpful in further elucidating how IACI exert their effect. The aim of this study is to look at the response of biomarkers of cartilage and bone metabolism after IACI in knee OA. Eighty subjects with symptomatic knee OA [45% male, mean age (SD) 64 (11) years] underwent routine knee joint injection with 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide and 4 ml 1% lignocaine.… Show more
“…16 This is the first study of a placental-derived injection for OA; however, these results compare favorably to other studies evaluating single IA injections, including a high-molecular-weight HA (58.9% for HA, 51.2% for saline at 26 weeks) 17 and a cross-linked HA (61.0% for HA, 54.6% for saline at 13 weeks). 18 IA injections for OA include a variety of therapies including steroids, 11,19,20 HA, 19,21,22 PRP, [23][24][25] bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), 24,26 adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs), 27 and autologous protein solution (APS), 28 with varying levels of supporting evidence. In this study, we focused on HA and saline as comparators to ASA for treatment of OA.…”
Placental-derived tissues are a known source of anti-inflammatory and immune modulating factors. Published pilot data on amniotic suspension allograft (ASA) for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) demonstrated safety and trends for improved pain and function. A multicenter randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of symptom modulation with ASA compared with saline and hyaluronic acid (HA) in subjects with knee OA. A total of 200 subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to ASA, HA, or saline, with subjects blinded to their allocation. Changes from baseline of patient-reported outcomes (PROs)—EQ-5D-5L, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS), Tegner, and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE)—were compared between groups. Patients reporting unacceptable pain at 3 months were considered treatment failures and withdrawn from the study. Statistical analysis was completed by comparing changes in PROs from baseline to 3 and 6 months for all groups. Comparison of demographics between treatment groups showed no significant differences between groups. Patients reporting unacceptable pain at 3 months in each group were ASA (13.2%), HA (68.8%), and saline (75%). Patients receiving ASA demonstrated significantly greater improvements from baseline for overall pain (VAS), KOOS pain, and KOOS-activities of daily living scores compared with those in the HA group (3 months) and both groups (6 months). ASA patients had significantly greater improvements in KOOS symptom scores compared with HA and saline at 3 and 6 months, respectively. OMERACT-OARSI responder rates for ASA, HA, and saline groups were 69.1, 39.1, and 42.6%, respectively (p = 0.0007). Subjects receiving ASA treatment showed greater improvements in PROs and fewer patients reported unacceptable pain compared with HA and saline. The evidence presented in this Level I Randomized Controlled Trial suggests that ASA injection is an effective treatment for the nonoperative management of symptomatic knee OA.
“…16 This is the first study of a placental-derived injection for OA; however, these results compare favorably to other studies evaluating single IA injections, including a high-molecular-weight HA (58.9% for HA, 51.2% for saline at 26 weeks) 17 and a cross-linked HA (61.0% for HA, 54.6% for saline at 13 weeks). 18 IA injections for OA include a variety of therapies including steroids, 11,19,20 HA, 19,21,22 PRP, [23][24][25] bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), 24,26 adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs), 27 and autologous protein solution (APS), 28 with varying levels of supporting evidence. In this study, we focused on HA and saline as comparators to ASA for treatment of OA.…”
Placental-derived tissues are a known source of anti-inflammatory and immune modulating factors. Published pilot data on amniotic suspension allograft (ASA) for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) demonstrated safety and trends for improved pain and function. A multicenter randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of symptom modulation with ASA compared with saline and hyaluronic acid (HA) in subjects with knee OA. A total of 200 subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to ASA, HA, or saline, with subjects blinded to their allocation. Changes from baseline of patient-reported outcomes (PROs)—EQ-5D-5L, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS), Tegner, and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE)—were compared between groups. Patients reporting unacceptable pain at 3 months were considered treatment failures and withdrawn from the study. Statistical analysis was completed by comparing changes in PROs from baseline to 3 and 6 months for all groups. Comparison of demographics between treatment groups showed no significant differences between groups. Patients reporting unacceptable pain at 3 months in each group were ASA (13.2%), HA (68.8%), and saline (75%). Patients receiving ASA demonstrated significantly greater improvements from baseline for overall pain (VAS), KOOS pain, and KOOS-activities of daily living scores compared with those in the HA group (3 months) and both groups (6 months). ASA patients had significantly greater improvements in KOOS symptom scores compared with HA and saline at 3 and 6 months, respectively. OMERACT-OARSI responder rates for ASA, HA, and saline groups were 69.1, 39.1, and 42.6%, respectively (p = 0.0007). Subjects receiving ASA treatment showed greater improvements in PROs and fewer patients reported unacceptable pain compared with HA and saline. The evidence presented in this Level I Randomized Controlled Trial suggests that ASA injection is an effective treatment for the nonoperative management of symptomatic knee OA.
“…Extraction of joint fluid for biomarker analysis even in the dry (non-effusive) knee is presently an important area in arthritis research and may also be integral to future joint preservation strategies and therapies [6,22,29,30]. Similar to Bhavsar et al, Yaqub et al, and Meehan et al, but using a different study design, we found that mechanical compression permitted fluid extraction in a much greater proportion of osteoarthritic knees that presented clinically as dry, non-effusive knees (Figure 3) [7-9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After non-pharmacologic interventions and topical and oral medications, complete arthrocentesis followed intraarticular injection of corticosteroids is often recommended for symptomatic flares and short-term relief of pain of arthritis of the knee [1-5]. Klocke and colleagues have recently reported that corticosteroid injection of the osteoarthritic knee may actually decrease cartilage degradation in the short-term as measured by biomarkers, providing indirect support for the above recommendations [1-6]. Recently, Meehan et al, Bhavsar et al, and Yaqub et al have demonstrated that mechanical compression of the knee provides more complete arthrocentesis before injection in both the effusive and non-effusive knee and suggest that mechanical compression might be a reasonable quality improvement intervention for arthrocentesis [6-9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Klocke and colleagues have recently reported that corticosteroid injection of the osteoarthritic knee may actually decrease cartilage degradation in the short-term as measured by biomarkers, providing indirect support for the above recommendations [1-6]. Recently, Meehan et al, Bhavsar et al, and Yaqub et al have demonstrated that mechanical compression of the knee provides more complete arthrocentesis before injection in both the effusive and non-effusive knee and suggest that mechanical compression might be a reasonable quality improvement intervention for arthrocentesis [6-9]. In the present study we determined knee arthrocentesis and injection quality measures before and after the introduction of mechanical compression as a quality improvement intervention.…”
ObjectiveThe present study reports the introduction of mechanical compression of the knee for arthrocentesis as quality improvement intervention in a procedure clinic.Methods430 consecutive symptomatic osteoarthritic knees underwent arthrocentesis followed by corticosteroid injection (1mg/kg of triamcinolone acetonide). The first 215 consecutive knees underwent conventional arthrocentesis and injection; the quality intervention of a mechanical compression brace was introduced, and the next 215 consecutive knees underwent mechanical compression-assisted arthrocentesis follow by injection. Pain scores, arthrocentesis success, fluid yield, time-to-next-intervention, injections/year, and medical costs were measured.ResultsNo serious adverse events occurred in 430 subjects. Diagnostic synovial fluid (≥2 ml) was obtained in 9.3% (20/215) without compression and 40.9% (88/215) with compression (p=0.00001, z for 95% CI= 1.96, Pierson). Mechanical compression was associated with a 231% increase in mean arthrocentesis volume: compression 5.3±11.2 ml, conventional 1.6±6.4 ml (CI of difference 2.0 <3.7< 5.4; p=0.00001). Time-to-next-intervention after compression-assisted arthrocentesis was longer: 6.9±3.5 months compared to conventional: 5.1±2.7 months (p<0.00001, 95% CI of difference 1.2 <1.8< 2.3). Mechanical compression was associated with a reduction in the number of corticosteroid injections administered per year: mechanical compression: 1.7±0.9 injections/year; conventional: 2.4±0.5 injections/year (p<0.00001, 95% CI of difference −0.83 < −0.70< −0.56). Mechanical compression did not increase overall yearly costs associated with management of the symptomatic knee (mechanical compression: $293.30/year/knee, conventional: $373.29/year/knee) (p<0.0001, 95% CI of difference 47 <80< 112).ConclusionsRoutine mechanical compression of the knee for arthrocentesis and injection is an effective bioengineering quality improvement intervention in a procedure clinic.
“…Type IIA (PIIANP) contains exon 2 and is expressed by chondroprogenitor cells, whereas type IIB (PIIBNP) is devoid of exon 2 and is expressed in differentiated chondrocytes [ 21 – 23 ]. Although Sharif reported that serum PIIANP in knee OA progressors was higher than that in OA non-progressors [ 24 ], most of the previous studies have demonstrated that serum PIIANP decreased in knee OA patients compared to controls [ 25 – 30 ]. PIIBNP is believed to be the only procollagen expressed during the formation of type II collagen in healthy adult human cartilage [ 31 ].…”
BackgroundKashin-Beck disease (KBD) is an endemic, chronic, degenerative osteoarthropathy. KBD is usually diagnosed by using X-ray image and clinical symptoms, lacking of serological biomarkers. The serum level of PIICP, PIIANP, and PIIBNP can specifically reflect the damage of the cartilage. So, in this study, the serum levels of PIICP, PIIANP, and PIIBNP were detected in order to determine whether they can be used as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of KBD.MethodUsing a status survey, the survey sites were selected in the KBD historical endemic areas and non-endemic areas in Jilin and Heilongjiang provinces. All local residents have undergone clinical examination, X-ray examination of the hands and knees, and questionnaire survey. A total of 554 people were surveyed, and 184 residents who are eligible for inclusion criteria were selected as our subjects. Fifty-six cases were diagnosed as KBD and 63 individuals were included as internal control and 65 subjects were included as external control. And blood samples of surveyed subjects were collected, and the serum was separated to detect the levels of PIICP, PIIANP, and PIIBNP by ELISA. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences in age and sex among the three groups. The Kruskal-Wallis H test showed that the serum levels of PIICP, PIIANP, and PIIBNP were significantly different among the three groups. Multiple comparisons using Dunnett’s T3 test revealed that serum levels of PIICP, PIIANP, and PIIBNP were significantly lower in KBD patients than in internal and external control. However, there was no significant difference between the internal and external control.ConclusionsThe results preliminarily indicated that the levels of PIICP, PIIANP, and PIIBNP in serum could reflect the abnormal synthesis of type II collagen in KBD patients and suggested that these indicators might be used as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of KBD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.